關於 congress nancy pelosi ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

【#過去24小時 2.14 美國 🇺🇸】
　
「謝謝大家...Make America Great Again的使命即將重新展開！」在短短5天的彈劾審判後，美國聯邦參議院13日下午就前總統川普涉嫌煽動支持者1月6日暴力攻擊國會一案，正式進行彈劾定罪表決。在民主黨團全體動員、7名共和黨人又公開跑票的狀態下，儘管「有罪票」過半的幅度比預期更多，但「57票有罪：43票無罪」的最終結果，仍沒有通過定罪總統所需要參院3分之2門檻（67票以上）——總統生涯中，兩度被眾院彈劾的川普，自此再度「全身而退」。
.
在短短5天的彈劾審判中，儘管民主黨指派的彈劾監察出示了一系列未公開的證據影片，還原了1月6日國會山莊遇襲事件的驚悚過程；但控訴內容中，仍沒有進一步的罪證控訴足以證明「川普懷有『煽動暴民攻擊國會』的實質意圖」。
.
與此同時，川普派的辯護律師與共和黨的參院主流派黨團，都抱持著「加速審判」的敷衍心態，眾人只希望審判過程不要再出現意外事證、不要再節外生枝，以求能在「不用積極為川普辯護」的保守情況下，守住「不彈劾卸任總統」的程序問題防線，好讓全案如願流產。
.
共和黨的邏輯心態，尤以參院黨團領袖麥康諾的意圖最為直白——在國會山莊遇襲後，憤怒的麥康諾先是與川普政權切割，之後又不斷譴責川普總統的「煽動罪責」；但同時，麥康諾卻也隨著基層風向緩步修正，並帶領著共和黨團死咬著程序問題不放，主張「川普就算有罪，參議院也無權咎責卸任總統...因此無需追打川普可能的犯罪經過」。
.
麥康諾認為，川普雖然在敗選之後，已與共和黨主流派已經決裂，「川派議員們」更成為黨團各大政治金主的封殺眼中釘；但在基層共和黨人中，只有13%的支持者認為應該彈劾川普。因此如果麥康諾過度地配合民主黨的彈劾審判，反而有可能擴大共和黨的內部分裂，陷「大老黨」（GOP，共和黨暱稱）於長期內戰之中。
.
「川普前總統煽動暴動的舉動，確實很不光彩、完全違背了他的職權——毫無疑問地，總統川普確實對煽動暴徒攻擊國會一案，負有實質與道德性的責任，這點是無庸置疑的。」
.
在審判表決前，麥康諾曾如此表示。但其隨後話鋒一轉，再度強調對參議院彈劾前總統的程序質疑——他隨後雖放寬了黨紀動員，授權共和黨議員自行投票；但自己卻在投票前夕放出風聲，以帶風向的方式宣布：「在左思右想後...麥康諾仍然決定護航川普，投下『無罪票』。』
.
面對川普再度全身而退的結果，民主黨的國會領袖——參議院多數黨領袖舒默（Chuck Schumer）與眾議院議長裴洛西（Nancy Pelosi）——也隨即表態譴責共和黨的同事，並稱這將是美國政治史上最恥辱、最不明是非的一天。
.
但在麥康諾對外暗示「不跟進追擊清算川普」後，參議院的彈劾審判就已進入了數量上不可能定罪的「垃圾時間」——這一點，裴洛西與民主黨都十分清楚...
.
#美國 #川普 #彈劾 #Impeachment #Trump #Senate #Congress #GOP #民主黨 #共和黨 #憲法 #拜登 #Biden

《BBC》1/8 （丘吉爾、東大寺雙主播）

* 美國國會警察局發表聲明：該部門警察Brian D. Sicknick週三奉命至國會大廈應對暴民，在衝突中受了傷。Sinicknick於當地時間週四晚上9時30分傷重去世。

此不幸事件加大了要求川普下台的聲音：儘管他的任期只剩13天。美國眾議院議長Nancy Pelosi敦促副總統潘斯（Mike Pence）援引《憲法》第25條修正案，宣布總統不適合任職。

另外，她發出重大聲明稿，若潘斯不要求川普下台，她將要依憲法發動彈劾總統。

在各界壓力下，川普終於譴責昨日暴力佔領國會者，其行為是“令人髮指的襲擊”。

US Capitol riot: Police officer dies amid pressure on Trump over inciting violence https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-55583264

* 參加支持川普的集會後闖入國會山的抗議者是誰？

Capitol riots: Who broke into the building? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/55572805

*美國華盛頓國會大廈風暴，震撼全球。

Capitol riots: Panel of Americans ‘shocked’ and ‘disgusted’ https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-55582166

* 美國人對於週三在國會大廈發生的暴力事件感到不安，人們正質問在美國政府的中心，為何會發生如此大規模的違規行為，提出嚴重質疑。

許多美國人認為，當成千上萬川普支持者可以輕而易舉進入該國歷史上和政治上都最重要的建築物之一，這令人難以理解。

照片和鏡頭顯示暴民在內部漫遊的程度。人們看到數十名川普支持者在議堂上、議會主席、眾議院議長辦公室拍照留念，並且直播他們的行動。當他們胡鬧走動拍照時，等同掠奪和破壞美國民主的象徵。

隨著事件在網上和全球新聞的報導，人民質疑美國國會大廈警察的準備和反應。美國國會大廈警察大約有2,000名警官，其職責是保護建築物和議員。

暴力抗爭者直播於社群媒體影片顯示，稀疏的警察隊伍迅速被人群淹沒，其中一些抗議者身穿盔甲，揮舞著手槍武器和化學噴霧劑。

暴力事件發生數小時後，一些抗議者雖被攝影機拍到，但也被護送或不加逮捕地將其引出建築物。甚至似乎在國會大廈得到幫助，為他們開門而出。

另一個剪輯似乎顯示出警務人員正與一名抗議男子合影。

驕傲男孩極右翼組織的知名成員Nick Ochs在自己的推特上發了一張自拍照，然後告訴CNN：“那裡有成千上萬的人-他們（指國民衞隊）無法控制局勢。我沒有被制止或質疑。”

Capitol riots: Questions mount over security failure https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-55577362

*川普在壓力之下，譴責襲擊國會的民眾。但BBC整理事件發生過程：在當地時間中午之前，成千上萬的人聚集在白宮附近的草地上，聆聽總統川普在“拯救美國”集會上的講話。
當時川普告訴他們：“我們要沿著賓州亞大道走……我們要去國會大廈，然後我們要努力給……我們的共和黨人，那些弱者……一些自豪和勇敢。他們需要為我們奪回我們的國家。”

演講結束之後，人群開始走向大約一英里半處的國會大廈，警察以護欄在當地與他們對峙。

衝突在國會大廈外開始，國會大廈是組成國會的美國政府兩個議院的所在地，即眾議院和參議院。13:10左右，人群開始聚集在建築物的兩側，高呼口號，「奪回我們的國家」「偷竊選舉」，民眾在金屬製成的路障處與警察開始搏鬥。警方使用催淚瓦斯和胡椒噴霧，此時警方尚能控制局面。

之後，民眾聚集的東側，人群穿過警方擠過國會大廈廣場上的路障，駛入正門，迅速進入大圓形大廳。

進入國會大廈後，示威者前往參議院和辦公室。《赫芬頓郵報》的記者伊戈爾·波比奇（Igor Bobic）此時拍攝了一個場景，一大群人，迫使人力不足的警察在人群繼續前進時，撤下樓梯。

參議員被迫放棄確認當選總統拜登獲勝的過程，此時這座建築則被封鎖。眾議院房間的門則已封鎖，國會警察再度在眾議院的門前豎立了一個臨時路障。此時國會安全主管才命令守衛入口，必要時開槍。

Capitol riots: A visual guide to the storming of Congress https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-55575260

* 韓國現代汽車可能與蘋果電動汽車搭檔引發巿場猜測。

這家韓國汽車公司最初表示，它正在與iPhone製造商就可能建立電動汽車合作夥伴關係進行談判。
但是數小時後，它又否認了，並表示正在與許多潛在的合作夥伴進行交談，而沒有提到蘋果。

正式宣布合併後，現代汽車的股價上漲了20％以上。

Hyundai's confusion over Apple electric car tie-up https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-55583504

"Dozens of rallies are being organized across the country on Saturday as part of a movement called “Stop the Steal,” which falsely asserts that the presidential election was manipulated against President Trump.

Here are some of the unsubstantiated and inaccurate claims that you might encounter, and why they are wrong.

No, there was no widespread voter fraud.

Claim: Widespread voter fraud undermined the election and swung the vote against President Trump.

Fact: Neither election officials nor journalists have found any evidence to support that claim.

Background: This is the broadest claim being made by the Stop the Steal group. But reporters from The New York Times called voting officials representing both political parties in every state and found no evidence that fraud or other irregularities played a role in the outcome of the presidential race.

Many of the claims suggest that the alleged fraud involved mail-in ballots. Election experts have repeatedly asserted that mail-in ballots are safe. They calculated that in a 20-year period, fraud involving mailed ballots affected 0.00006 percent of votes, or one case per state every six or seven years.

No, tens of thousands of dead people did not vote.

Claim: Tens of thousands of ballots were cast in the names of dead people in Pennsylvania and Michigan.

Fact: There is no evidence that votes were cast in the names of dead people.

Background: The claim that dead people voted has been promoted by people close to Mr. Trump, including Rudy Giuliani, one of his personal lawyers.

In many cases, the claims have been bolstered by people conflating voting rolls, which list people who can potentially vote, with actual voting records. Those mistakes were often fixed before or during Election Day, and people who have passed away were removed from the voting roles. Lists that have circulated on social media sites sharing the names of dead people who supposedly voted have also largely been debunked by The Times and others.

No, voters are not casting hundreds of ballots under maiden names.
Claim: Voters cast unauthorized votes under maiden names.
Fact: There is no evidence that any votes were cast by impersonators using maiden names.

Background: This rumor was started when a woman tweeted that her mother’s maiden name had been stolen by someone who used it to vote. The tweet did not provide any evidence of the claim.

Election officials said there was no proof that individuals committed voter fraud by registering to vote, and then casting a vote using a maiden name. They added that they had received no individual complaints about specific cases.

No, a postal worker in Pennsylvania did not witness voter fraud.
Claim: A postal worker in Pennsylvania said he had seen his supervisor “tampering with mail-in ballots.”

Fact: The postal worker retracted his claims, and no evidence was found to support what he had said.

Background: The claims originated in a video released by Project Veritas, a conservative group that has repeatedly spread disinformation. The video featured a postal worker, Richard Hopkins, who said he had overheard a discussion about backdating ballots that arrived in the mail after Election Day.

The video did not provide evidence of any voter fraud, and Mr. Hopkins did not say that he had seen any fraud occur. Mr. Hopkins later recanted his allegations, according to a report by the inspector general’s office to Congress.

No, Dominion voting machines did not cause widespread problems.
Claim: A “software glitch” created by Dominion Voting Systems, a company that makes software used during the elections, changed vote tallies in Michigan and Georgia.

Fact: Election officials have found that software problems did not affect final vote counts.

Background: Two of the five counties that experienced software problems in Michigan and Georgia used Dominion voting systems and in both of those cases, the issues did not affect vote counts, according to election officials. The problems with Dominion’s systems were attributed to human error, such as incorrectly entering old files into the systems, and they were fixed before final vote counts were released.

Claims that Dominion is owned or controlled by high-profile Democrats, including the Clinton family and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, have also been debunked. Dominion, originally a Canadian company that is now based in Denver, is largely owned by the New York-based private equity firm Staple Street Capital and Dominion’s chief executive, John Poulos.