關於 running on real food ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

#notarantbutaCONFESSION

Mummy said she’s on the verge of breaking down…
𝙎𝙡𝙚𝙚𝙥 𝙙𝙚𝙥𝙧𝙞𝙫𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣. Woke up every 2 hours to pump/ breastfeed is really crazy. By the time I’m done, I’m probably left with another 30 mins or so for the next session. I’m not sure how some mothers can sleep in between sessions 😔 I skipped 1-2 session so that I can sleep but usually end up with engorged breast. I don’t even need any alarm to wake me up 😵‍💫

𝙁𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙜𝙪𝙚. On daily pain killer 💊 is a must for me in order for bae to do my wound dressing. It is cleaned twice a day. It’s an open wound, cut vertically on my existing scar. 🩸Fresh pink/ red flesh can be seen on my lower abdomen but so far I had probably only seen it less than 5 times. I left the details to hubby 🙋🏻‍♂️and he’ll summarize for me whether my condition is improving or worsen bcs I have very weak heart seeing “bloody-gruesome” wound like this. But so far, thankfully, it’s healing well. 🙏🏻 It’s been 2 weeks since, doc told me I need a minimum 1 month for the wound to “close up”. Let’s hope for the best!💯

𝘽𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙠𝙙𝙤𝙬𝙣. Despite staying indoor and ordered everything online, number of Covid cases is still on the high side. 😒 Hospitals are running out of bed, front liners are breaking down. Many committed suicide because of the continuous lockdown (failed gov). Rakyat are suffering. 💔 Me too, the need to socialize and to dine out on my fav food is so far-fetched (Impossible! Unrealistic!) with the current situation. But everyone in Malaysia has been like this since, what? last year? I even lost count of the time. 😢 But I know it has been like this for a very very very long time… Trapped at home for way too long felt like living in hell! Did we all just wasted our lives for the past 2 years waiting for our gov to make things better! Sigh… I only saw how things got worse! 😮‍💨

𝙋𝙤𝙤𝙧 𝘼𝙥𝙥𝙚𝙩𝙞𝙩𝙚. One of the reason is due to my wound too. 🤕 And with weaker body, contributes to weaker state of mind too due to restricted movement etc. Confinement food is also not what I enjoy when I was having poor appetite 🤢. Still prefer food which offer balance meals and variety. 👩🏻‍⚕️Yes, doc said I have no food restriction after I clarified with them. I even showered daily bcs of my visit to NICU and hospital for the first two weeks🏥, followed by my admission in hosp due to my csec wound. Hygiene is very important 🛀, especially during the pandemic. ⚠️ I do not want to bring any viruses home to my family. 🦠 Not at all.

𝙂𝘿𝙈. Gestational diabetes is high blood sugar (glucose) 📝 that develops during pregnancy and usually disappears after giving birth. I was on controlled diet 🍛 throughout my pregnancy and I will have to take another test this August to confirm if GDM still exist. And because of this, I’m also a lil bit depressed 😪 bcs I can’t reward myself with some good dessert or ice creams!🍦 This is the real zero quality of life when you don’t get to enjoy life up to your liking/ preference 🖤! Not when you’re a foodie right! Sorry for the zero update on my food ig @𝙨𝙝𝙚𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙨_𝙨𝙝𝙚𝙘𝙤𝙤𝙠𝙨 too! 🥵

I just hope all the bad and unhappy times will be over soon. 👎 This is not a rant, just a confession of what’s really going on in my pregnancy journey🤰🏻. Not all motherhood journey is a bed of roses. But comparing this to my cancer journey, this is definitely much better 🍀. Because out of the pain and misery, I have Isabelle with me 👶🏻. She’s healthy, sweet, adorable and quite manageable so far. Just a lil bit out of control when she’s hungry🍼! Hahaha! I’m mastering it soon on how to deal with her tantrum 😆 Just offer her the boobies🤱🏻!

𝘼𝙡𝙡 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙗𝙚𝙨𝙩 𝙩𝙤 𝙖𝙡𝙡 𝙛𝙞𝙧𝙨𝙩 𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙚 𝙢𝙤𝙢𝙢𝙖 𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙚 𝙢𝙚! 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙤𝙖𝙙 𝙘𝙖𝙣 𝙗𝙚 𝙗𝙪𝙢𝙥𝙮 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙚𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙜, 𝙗𝙪𝙩 𝙙𝙤𝙣’𝙩 𝙜𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙪𝙥 𝙮𝙚𝙖! 𝙊𝙣𝙚 𝙨𝙩𝙚𝙥 𝙖𝙩 𝙖 𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙚, 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜𝙨 𝙬𝙞𝙡𝙡 𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙪𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙮 𝙜𝙚𝙩 𝙗𝙚𝙩𝙩𝙚𝙧. 𝙒𝙚 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙖𝙡𝙡 𝙙𝙤𝙣𝙚 𝙖 𝙜𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙩 𝙟𝙤𝙗 𝙩𝙤 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙘𝙚𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙜𝙧𝙤𝙬 𝙖 𝙢𝙞𝙣𝙞 𝙝𝙪𝙢𝙖𝙣! 𝙃𝙤𝙬 𝙖𝙢𝙖𝙯𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩! 𝙉𝙤 𝙤𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙘𝙖𝙣 𝙧𝙚𝙥𝙡𝙖𝙘𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙪𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙥𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙧 𝙤𝙛 𝙖 𝙢𝙤𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙮𝙚𝙖𝙝! 𝙒𝙚𝙡𝙡 𝙬𝙞𝙨𝙝𝙚𝙨 𝙩𝙤 𝙖𝙡𝙡 𝙖𝙡𝙧𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩 ❤️ 𝙡𝙤𝙩𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙡𝙤𝙫𝙚 💋

🌈 𝘚𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘮𝘦 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘴𝘰 𝘐 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘯𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘦 𝘪𝘵 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘰’𝘳𝘦 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘢𝘮𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨. 𝘠𝘰𝘶’𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘢𝘭𝘰𝘯𝘦! 💛

#babyisabelleNQY #fullybreastfeed

這是前些日子爆出已經被加拿大法院接理對藏傳佛教噶舉派法王的訟訴。（加拿大法院鏈接在此：https://www.bccourts.ca/jdb-txt/sc/21/09/2021BCSC0939cor1.htm?fbclid=IwAR2FLZlzmUIGTBaTuKPVchEqqngcE3Qy6G_C0TWNWVKa2ksbIYkVJVMQ8f8）

這位法王的桃色事件，我是幾年前才聽到。但，藏傳佛教的高層有這些性醜聞，我已經聽了幾十年。我以前的一位前女友也被一些堪布藉故上她的家摟抱過，也有一些活佛跟她表白。（這不只是她，其他地方我也聽過不少）

這是一個藏傳佛教裡面系統式的問題。

很多時候發生這種事情，信徒和教主往往都是說女方得不到寵而報仇，或者說她們也精神病，或者說她們撒謊。

我不排除有這種可能性，但，多過一位，甚至多位出來指證的時候，我是傾向於相信『沒有那麼巧這麼多有精神病的女人要撒謊來報仇』。

大寶法王的桃色事件，最先吹哨的是一位台灣的在家信徒，第二位是香港的女出家人，現在加拿大又多一位公開舉報上法庭。

對大寶法王信徒來說，這一次的比較麻煩，因為是有孩子的。（關於有孩子的，我早在法王的桃色事件曝光時，就有聽聞）

如果法庭勒令要驗證DNA，這對法王和他的信徒來說，會很尷尬和矛盾，因為做或不做，都死。

你若問我，我覺得『人數是有力量的』，同時我也覺得之後有更多的人站出來，是不出奇的。

我也藉此呼籲各方佛教徒，如果你們真的愛佛教，先別說批判，但如鴕鳥般不討論這些爭議，你是間接害了佛教。

（下面是我從加拿大法院鏈接拷貝下來的內容，當中有很多細節。）

Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION

BACKGROUND

ANALYSIS

A. The Spousal Support Claim in this Case

B. The Test to Amend Pleadings

C. Pleadings in Family Law Cases

D. The Legal Concept of a Marriage-Like Relationship

E. Is There a Reasonable Claim of a Marriage-Like Relationship?

F. Delay / Prejudice

CONCLUSION



INTRODUCTION
[1] The claimant applies to amend her notice of family claim to seek spousal support. At issue is whether the claimant’s allegations give rise to a reasonable claim she lived with the respondent in a marriage-like relationship, so as to give rise to a potential entitlement to spousal support under the Family Law Act, S.B.C. 2011, c. 25 (“FLA”).

[2] The facts alleged by the claimant do not fit within a traditional concept of marriage. The claimant does not allege that she and the respondent ever lived together. Indeed, she has only met the respondent in person four times: twice very briefly in a public setting; a third time in private, when she alleges the respondent sexually assaulted her; and a fourth and final occasion, when she informed the respondent she was pregnant with his child.

[3] The claimant’s case is that what began as a non-consensual sexual encounter evolved into a loving and affectionate relationship. That relationship occurred almost entirely over private text messages. The parties rarely spoke on the telephone, and never saw one another during the relationship, even over video. The claimant says they could not be together because the respondent is forbidden by his station and religious beliefs from intimate relationships or marriage. Nonetheless, she alleges, they formed a marriage-like relationship that lasted from January 2018 to January 2019.

[4] The respondent denies any romantic relationship with the claimant. While he acknowledges providing emotional and financial support to the claimant, he says it was for the benefit of the child the claimant told him was his daughter.

[5] The claimant’s proposed amendment raises a novel question: can a secret relationship that began on-line and never moved into the physical world be like a marriage? In my view, that question should be answered by a trial judge after hearing all of the evidence. The alleged facts give rise to a reasonable claim the claimant lived with the respondent in a marriage-like relationship. Accordingly, I grant the claimant leave to amend her notice of family claim.

BACKGROUND
[6] It should be emphasized that this is an application to amend pleadings only. The allegations by the claimant are presumed to be true for the purposes of this application. Those allegations have not been tested in a court of law.

[7] The respondent, Ogyen Trinley Dorje, is a high lama of the Karma Kagyu School of Tibetan Buddhism. He has been recognized and enthroned as His Holiness, the 17th Gyalwang Karmapa. Without meaning any disrespect, I will refer to him as Mr. Dorje in these reasons for judgment.

[8] Mr. Dorje leads a monastic and nomadic lifestyle. His true home is Tibet, but he currently resides in India. He receives followers from around the world at the Gyuto Monetary in India. He also travels the world teaching Tibetan Buddhist Dharma and hosting pujas, ceremonies at which Buddhists express their gratitude and devotion to the Buddha.

[9] The claimant, Vikki Hui Xin Han, is a former nun of Tibetan Buddhism. Ms. Han first encountered Mr. Dorje briefly at a large puja in 2014. The experience of the puja convinced Ms. Han she wanted to become a Buddhist nun. She met briefly with Mr. Dorje, in accordance with Kagyu traditions, to obtain his approval to become a nun.

[10] In October 2016, Ms. Han began a three-year, three-month meditation retreat at a monastery in New York State. Her objective was to learn the practices and teachings of the Kagyu Lineage. Mr. Dorje was present at the retreat twice during the time Ms. Han was at the monastery.

[11] Ms. Han alleges that on October 14, 2017, Mr. Dorje sexually assaulted her in her room at the monastery. She alleges that she became pregnant from the assault.

[12] After she learned that she was pregnant, Ms. Han requested a private audience with Mr. Dorje. In November 2017, in the presence of his bodyguards, Ms. Han informed Mr. Dorje she was pregnant with his child. Mr. Dorje initially denied responsibility; however, he provided Ms. Han with his email address and a cellphone number, and, according to Ms. Han, said he would “prepare some money” for her.

[13] Ms. Han abandoned her plan to become a nun, left the retreat and returned to Canada. She never saw Mr. Dorje again.

[14] After Ms. Han returned to Canada, she and Mr. Dorje began a regular communication over an instant messaging app called Line. They also exchanged emails and occasionally spoke on the telephone.

[15] The parties appear to have expressed care and affection for one another in these communications. I say “appear to” because it is difficult to fully understand the meaning and intentions of another person from brief text messages, especially those originally written in a different language. The parties wrote in a private shorthand, sharing jokes, emojis, cartoon portraits and “hugs” or “kisses”. Ms. Han was the more expressive of the two, writing more frequently and in longer messages. Mr. Dorje generally participated in response to questions or prompting from Ms. Han, sometimes in single word messages.

[16] Ms. Han deposes that she believed Mr. Dorje was in love with her and that, by January 2018, she and Mr. Dorje were living in a “conjugal relationship”.

[17] During their communications, Ms. Han expressed concern that her child would be “illegitimate”. She appears to have asked Mr. Dorje to marry her, and he appears to have responded that he was “not ready”.

[18] Throughout 2018, Mr. Dorje transferred funds in various denominations to Ms. Han through various third parties. Ms. Han deposes that these funds were:

a) $50,000 CDN to deliver the child and for postpartum care she was to receive at a facility in Seattle;

b) $300,000 CDN for the first year of the child’s life;

c) $20,000 USD for a wedding ring, because Ms. Han wrote “Even if we cannot get married, you must buy me a wedding ring”;

d) $400,000 USD to purchase a home for the mother and child.

[19] On June 19, 2018, Ms. Han gave birth to a daughter in Richmond, B.C.

[20] On September 17, 2018, Mr. Dorje wrote, ”Taking care of her and you are my duty for life”.

[21] Ms. Han’s expectation was that the parties would live together in the future. She says they planned to live together. Those plans evolved over time. Initially they involved purchasing a property in Toronto, so that Mr. Dorje could visit when he was in New York. They also discussed purchasing property in Calgary or renting a home in Vancouver for that purpose. Ms. Han eventually purchased a condominium in Richmond using funds provided by Mr. Dorje.

[22] Ms. Han deposes that the parties made plans for Mr. Dorje to visit her and meet the child in Richmond. In October 2018, however, Mr. Dorje wrote that he needed to “disappear” to Europe. He wrote:

I will definitely find a way to meet her

And you

Remember to take care of yourself if something happens

[23] The final plan the parties discussed, according to Ms. Han, was that Mr. Dorje would sponsor Ms. Han and the child to immigrate to the United States and live at the Kagyu retreat centre in New York State.

[24] In January 2019, Ms. Han lost contact with Mr. Dorje.

[25] Ms. Han commenced this family law case on July 17, 2019, seeking child support, a declaration of parentage and a parentage test. She did not seek spousal support.

[26] Ms. Han first proposed a claim for spousal support in October 2020 after a change in her counsel. Following an exchange of correspondence concerning an application for leave to amend the notice of family claim, Ms. Han’s counsel wrote that Ms. Han would not be advancing a spousal support claim. On March 16, 2020, counsel reversed course, and advised that Ms. Han had instructed him to proceed with the application.

[27] When this application came on before me, the trial was set to commence on June 7, 2021. The parties were still in the process of discoveries and obtaining translations for hundreds of pages of documents in Chinese characters.

[28] At a trial management conference on May 6, 2021, noting the parties were not ready to proceed, Madam Justice Walkem adjourned the trial to April 11, 2022.

ANALYSIS
A. The Spousal Support Claim in this Case
[29] To claim spousal support in this case, Ms. Han must plead that she lived with Mr. Dorje in a marriage-like relationship. This is because only “spouses” are entitled to spousal support, and s. 3 of the Family Law Act defines a spouse as a person who is married or has lived with another person in a marriage-like relationship:

3 (1) A person is a spouse for the purposes of this Act if the person

(a) is married to another person, or

(b) has lived with another person in a marriage-like relationship, and

(i) has done so for a continuous period of at least 2 years, or

(ii) except in Parts 5 [Property Division] and 6 [Pension Division], has a child with the other person.

[30] Because she alleges she has a child with Mr. Dorje, Ms. Han need not allege that the relationship endured for a continuous period of two years to claim spousal support; but she must allege that she lived in a marriage-like relationship with him at some point in time. Accordingly, she must amend the notice of family claim.

B. The Test to Amend Pleadings
[31] Given that the notice of trial has been served, Ms. Han requires leave of the court to amend the notice of family claim: Supreme Court Family Rule 8-1(1)(b)(i).

[32] A person seeking to amend a notice of family claim must show that there is a reasonable cause of action. This is a low threshold. What the applicant needs to establish is that, if the facts pleaded are proven at trial, they would support a reasonable claim. The applicant’s allegations of fact are assumed to be true for the purposes of this analysis. Cantelon v. Wall, 2015 BCSC 813, at para. 7-8.

[33] The applicant’s delay, the reasons for the delay, and the prejudice to the responding party are also relevant factors. The ultimate consideration is whether it would be just and convenient to allow the amendment. Cantelon, at para. 6, citing Teal Cedar Products Ltd. v. Dale Intermediaries Ltd. et al (1986), 19 B.C.L.R. (3d) 282.

C. Pleadings in Family Law Cases
[34] Supreme Court Family Rules 3-1(1) and 4-1(1) require that a claim to spousal support be pleaded in a notice of family claim in Form F3. Section 2 of Form F3, “Spousal relationship history”, requires a spousal support claimant to check the boxes that apply to them, according to whether they are or have been married or are or have been in a marriage-like relationship. Where a claimant alleges a marriage-like relationship, Form F3 requires that they provide the date on which they began to live together with the respondent in a marriage-like relationship and, where applicable, the date on which they separated. Form F3 does not require a statement of the factual basis for the claim of spousal support.

[35] In this case, Ms. Han seeks to amend the notice of family claim to allege that she and Mr. Dorje began to live in a marriage-like relationship in or around January 2018, and separated in or around January 2019.

[36] An allegation that a person lived with a claimant in a marriage-like relationship is a conclusion of law, not an allegation of fact. Unlike the rules governing pleadings in civil actions, however, the Supreme Court Family Rules do not expressly require family law claimants to plead the material facts in support of conclusions of law.

[37] In other words, there is no express requirement in the Supreme Court Family Rules that Ms. Han plead the facts on which she relies for the allegation she and Mr. Dorje lived in a marriage-like relationship.

[38] Rule 4-6 authorizes a party to demand particulars, and then apply to the court for an order for further and better particulars, of a matter stated in a pleading. However, unless and until she is granted leave and files the proposed amended notice of family claim, Ms. Han’s allegation of a marriage-like relationship is not a matter stated in a pleading.

[39] Ms. Han filed an affidavit in support of her application to amend the notice of family claim. Normally, evidence would not be required or admissible on an application to amend a pleading. However, in the unusual circumstances of this case, the parties agreed I may look to Ms. Han’s affidavit and exhibits for the facts she pleads in support of the allegation of a marriage-like relationship.

[40] Because this is an application to amend - and Ms. Han’s allegations of fact are presumed to be true - I have not considered Mr. Dorje’s responding affidavit.

[41] Relying on affidavit evidence for an application to amend pleadings is less than ideal. It tends to merge and confuse the material facts with the evidence that would be relied on to prove those facts. In a number of places in her affidavit, for example, Ms. Han describes her feelings, impressions and understandings. A person’s hopes and intentions are not normally material facts unless they are mutual or reasonably held. The facts on which Ms. Han alleges she and Mr. Dorje formed a marriage-like relationship are more important for the present purposes than her belief they entered into a conjugal union.

[42] Somewhat unusually, in this case, almost all of the parties’ relevant communications were in writing. This makes it somewhat easier to separate the facts from the evidence; however, as stated above, it is difficult to understand the intentions and actions of a person from brief text messages.

[43] In my view, it would be a good practice for applicants who seek to amend their pleadings in family law cases to provide opposing counsel and the court with a schedule of the material facts on which they rely for the proposed amendment.

D. The Legal Concept of a Marriage-Like Relationship
[44] As Mr. Justice Myers observed in Mother 1 v. Solus Trust Company, 2019 BCSC 200, the concept of a marriage-like relationship is elastic and difficult to define. This elasticity is illustrated by the following passage from Yakiwchuk v. Oaks, 2003 SKQB 124, quoted by Myers J. at para. 133 of Mother 1:

[10] Spousal relationships are many and varied. Individuals in spousal relationships, whether they are married or not, structure their relationships differently. In some relationships there is a complete blending of finances and property - in others, spouses keep their property and finances totally separate and in still others one spouse may totally control those aspects of the relationship with the other spouse having little or no knowledge or input. For some couples, sexual relations are very important - for others, that aspect may take a back seat to companionship. Some spouses do not share the same bed. There may be a variety of reasons for this such as health or personal choice. Some people are affectionate and demonstrative. They show their feelings for their “spouse” by holding hands, touching and kissing in public. Other individuals are not demonstrative and do not engage in public displays of affection. Some “spouses” do everything together - others do nothing together. Some “spouses” vacation together and some spend their holidays apart. Some “spouses” have children - others do not. It is this variation in the way human beings structure their relationships that make the determination of when a “spousal relationship” exists difficult to determine. With married couples, the relationship is easy to establish. The marriage ceremony is a public declaration of their commitment and intent. Relationships outside marriage are much more difficult to ascertain. Rarely is there any type of “public” declaration of intent. Often people begin cohabiting with little forethought or planning. Their motivation is often nothing more than wanting to “be together”. Some individuals have chosen to enter relationships outside marriage because they did not want the legal obligations imposed by that status. Some individuals have simply given no thought as to how their relationship would operate. Often the date when the cohabitation actually began is blurred because people “ease into” situations, spending more and more time together. Agreements between people verifying when their relationship began and how it will operate often do not exist.

[45] In Mother 1, Mr. Justice Myers referred to a list of 22 factors grouped into seven categories, from Maldowich v. Penttinen, (1980), 17 R.F.L. (2d) 376 (Ont. Dist. Ct.), that have frequently been cited in this and other courts for the purpose of determining whether a relationship was marriage-like, at para. 134 of Mother 1:

1. Shelter:

(a) Did the parties live under the same roof?

(b) What were the sleeping arrangements?

(c) Did anyone else occupy or share the available accommodation?

2. Sexual and Personal Behaviour:

(a) Did the parties have sexual relations? If not, why not?

(b) Did they maintain an attitude of fidelity to each other?

(c) What were their feelings toward each other?

(d) Did they communicate on a personal level?

(e) Did they eat their meals together?

(f) What, if anything, did they do to assist each other with problems or during illness?

(g) Did they buy gifts for each other on special occasions?

3. Services:

What was the conduct and habit of the parties in relation to:

(a) preparation of meals;

(b) washing and mending clothes;

(c) shopping;

(d) household maintenance; and

(e) any other domestic services?

4. Social:

(a) Did they participate together or separately in neighbourhood and community activities?

(b) What was the relationship and conduct of each of them toward members of their respective families and how did such families behave towards the parties?

5. Societal:

What was the attitude and conduct of the community toward each of them and as a couple?

6. Support (economic):

(a) What were the financial arrangements between the parties regarding the provision of or contribution toward the necessaries of life (food, clothing, shelter, recreation, etc.)?

(b) What were the arrangements concerning the acquisition and ownership of property?

(c) Was there any special financial arrangement between them which both agreed would be determinant of their overall relationship?

7. Children:

What was the attitude and conduct of the parties concerning children?

[46] In Austin v. Goerz, 2007 BCCA 586, the Court of Appeal cautioned against a “checklist approach”; rather, a court should "holistically" examine all the relevant factors. Cases like Molodowich provide helpful indicators of the sorts of behaviour that society associates with a marital relationship, the Court of Appeal said; however, “the presence or absence of any particular factor cannot be determinative of whether a relationship is marriage-like” (para. 58).

[47] In Weber v. Leclerc, 2015 BCCA 492, the Court of Appeal again affirmed that there is no checklist of characteristics that will be found in all marriages and then concluded with respect to evidence of intentions:

[23] The parties’ intentions – particularly the expectation that the relationship will be of lengthy, indeterminate duration – may be of importance in determining whether a relationship is “marriage-like”. While the court will consider the evidence expressly describing the parties’ intentions during the relationship, it will also test that evidence by considering whether the objective evidence is consonant with those intentions.

[24] The question of whether a relationship is “marriage-like” will also typically depend on more than just their intentions. Objective evidence of the parties’ lifestyle and interactions will also provide direct guidance on the question of whether the relationship was “marriage-like”.

[48] Significantly for this case, the courts have looked to mutual intent in order to find a marriage-like relationship. See, for example, L.E. v. D.J., 2011 BCSC 671 and Buell v. Unger, 2011 BCSC 35; Davey Estate v. Gruyaert, 2005 CarswellBC 3456 at 13 and 35.

[49] In Mother 1, Myers J. concluded his analysis of the law with the following learned comment:

[143] Having canvassed the law relating to the nature of a marriage-like relationship, I will digress to point out the problematic nature of the concept. It may be apparent from the above that determining whether a marriage-like relationship exists sometimes seems like sand running through one's fingers. Simply put, a marriage-like relationship is akin to a marriage without the formality of a marriage. But as the cases mentioned above have noted, people treat their marriages differently and have different conceptions of what marriage entails.

[50] In short, the determination of whether the parties in this case lived in a marriage-like relationship is a fact-specific inquiry that a trial judge would need to make on a “holistic” basis, having regard to all of the evidence. While the trial judge may consider the various factors listed in the authorities, those factors would not be treated as a checklist and no single factor or category of factors would be treated as being decisive.

E. Is There a Reasonable Claim of a Marriage-Like Relationship?
[51] In this case, many of the Molodowich factors are missing:

a) The parties never lived under the same roof. They never slept together. They were never in the same place at the same time during the relationship. The last time they saw each other in person was in November 2017, before the relationship began.

b) The parties never had consensual sex. They did not hug, kiss or hold hands. With the exception of the alleged sexual assault, they never touched one another physically.

c) The parties expressed care and affection for one another, but they rarely shared personal information or interest in their lives outside of their direct topic of communication. They did not write about their families, their friends, their religious beliefs or their work.

d) They expressed concern and support for one another when the other felt unwell or experienced health issues, but they did not provide any care or assistance during illness or other problems.

e) They did not assist one another with domestic chores.

f) They did not share their relationship with their peers or their community. There is no allegation, for example, that Mr. Dorje told his fellow monks or any of his followers about the relationship. There is no allegation that Ms. Han told her friends or any co-workers. Indeed, there is no allegation that anyone, with the exception of Ms. Han’s mother, knew about the relationship. Although Mr. Dorje gave Ms. Han’s mother a gift, he never met the mother and he never spoke to her.

g) They did not intend to have a child together. The child was conceived as a result of a sexual assault. While Mr. Dorje expressed interest in “meeting” the child, he never followed up. He currently has no relationship with the child. There is no allegation he has sought access or parenting arrangements.

[52] The only Molodowich factor of any real relevance in this case is economic support. Mr. Dorje provided the funds with which Ms. Han purchased a condominium. Mr. Dorje initially wrote that he wanted to buy a property with the money, but, he wrote, “It’s the same thing if you buy [it]”.

[53] Mr. Dorje also provided a significant amount of money for Ms. Han’s postpartum care and the child’s first year of life.

[54] This financial support may have been primarily for the benefit of the child. Even the condominium, Ms. Han wrote, was primarily for the benefit of the child.

[55] However, in my view, a trial judge may attach a broader significance to the financial support from Mr. Dorje than child support alone. A trial judge may find that the money Mr. Dorje provided to Ms. Han at her request was an expression of his commitment to her in circumstances in which he could not commit physically. The money and the gifts may be seen by the trial judge to have been a form of down payment by Mr. Dorje on a promise of continued emotional and financial support for Ms. Han, or, in Mr. Dorje’s own words, “Taking care of her and you are my duty for life” (emphasis added).

[56] On the other hand, I find it difficult to attach any particular significance to the fact that Mr. Dorje agreed to provide funds for Ms. Han to purchase a wedding ring. It appears to me that Ms. Han demanded that Mr. Dorje buy her a wedding ring, not that the ring had any mutual meaning to the parties as a marriage symbol. But it is relevant, in my view, that Mr. Dorje provided $20,000 USD to Ms. Han for something she wanted that was of no benefit to the child.

[57] Further, Ms. Han alleges that the parties intended to live together. At a minimum, a trial judge may find that the discussions about where Ms. Han and the child would live reflected a mutual intention of the parties to see one another and spend time together when they could.

[58] Mr. Dorje argues that an intention to live together at some point in the future is not sufficient to show that an existing relationship was marriage-like. He argues that the question of whether the relationship was marriage-like requires more than just intentions, citing Weber, supra.

[59] In my view, the documentary evidence referred to above provides some objective evidence in this case that the parties progressed beyond mere intentions. As stated, the parties appear to have expressed genuine care and affection for one another. They appear to have discussed marriage, trust, honesty, finances, mutual obligations and acquiring family property. These are not matters one would expect Mr. Dorje to discuss with a friend or a follower, or even with the mother of his child, without a marriage-like element of the relationship.

[60] A trial judge may find on the facts alleged by Ms. Han that the parties loved one another and would have lived together, but were unable to do so because of Mr. Dorje’s religious duties and nomadic lifestyle.

[61] The question I raised in the introduction to these reasons is whether a relationship that began on-line and never moved into the physical world can be marriage-like.

[62] Notably, the definition of a spouse in the Family Law Act does not require that the parties live together, only that they live with another person in a marriage-like relationship.

[63] In Connor Estate, 2017 BCSC 978, Mr. Justice Kent found that a couple that maintained two entirely separate households and never lived under the same roof formed a marriage-like relationship. (Connor Estate was decided under the intestacy provisions of the Wills, Estates and Succession Act, S.B.C. 2009, c. 13 ("WESA"), but courts have relied on cases decided under WESA and the FLA interchangeably for their definitions of a spouse.) Mr. Justice Kent found:

[50] The evidence is overwhelming and I find as a fact that Mr. Chambers and Ms. Connor loved and cared deeply about each other, and that they had a loving and intimate relationship for over 20 years that was far more than mere friendship or even so-called "friendship with benefits". I accept Mr. Chambers' evidence that he would have liked to share a home with Ms. Connor after the separation from his wife, but was unable to do so because of Ms. Connor's hoarding illness. The evidence amply supports, and I find as a fact, that Mr. Chambers and Ms. Connor loved each other, were faithful to each other, communicated with each other almost every day when they were not together, considered themselves to be (and presented themselves to be) "husband and wife" and were accepted by all who knew them as a couple.

[64] Connor Estate may be distinguishable from this case because Mr. Chambers and Ms. Connor were physically intimate for over 20 years, and presented themselves to the world as a married couple.

[65] Other decisions in which a marriage-like relationship has been found to exist despite the parties not living together have involved circumstances in which the couple lived under the same roof at previous points in the relationship, and the issue was whether they continued to be spouses after they took up separate residences: in Thompson v. Floyd, 2001 BCCA 78, the parties had lived together for a period of at least 11 years; in Roach v. Dutra, 2010 BCCA 264, the parties had lived together for approximately three years.

[66] However, as Mr. Justice Kent noted in Connor Estate:

[48] … [W]hile much guidance might be found in this case law, the simple fact is that no two cases are identical (and indeed they usually vary widely) and it is the assessment of evidence as a whole in this particular case which matters.

[67] Mr. Justice Kent concluded:

[53] Like human beings themselves, marriage-like relationships can come in many and various shapes. In this particular case, I have no doubt that such a relationship existed …

[68] As stated, Ms. Han’s claim is novel. It may even be weak. Almost all of the traditional factors are missing. The fact that Ms. Han and Mr. Dorje never lived under the same roof, never shared a bed and never even spent time together in person will militate against a finding they lived with one another in a marriage-like relationship. However, the traditional factors are not a mandatory check-list that confines the “elastic” concept of a marriage-like relationship. And if the COVID pandemic has taught us nothing else, it is that real relationships can form, blossom and end in virtual worlds.

[69] In my view, the merits of Ms. Han’s claim should be decided on the evidence. Subject to an overriding prejudice to Mr. Dorje, she should have leave to amend the notice of family claim. However, she should also provide meaningful particulars of the alleged marriage-like relationship.

F. Delay / Prejudice
[70] Ms. Han filed her notice of family claim on July 17, 2019. She brought this application to amend approximately one year and nine months after she filed the pleading, just over two months before the original trial date.

[71] Ms. Han’s delay was made all that more remarkable by her change in position from January 19, 2021, when she confirmed, through counsel, that she was not seeking spousal support in this case.

[72] Ms. Han gave notice of her intention to proceed with this application to Mr. Dorje on March 16, 2021. By the time the application was heard, the parties had conducted examinations for discovery without covering the issues that would arise from a claim of spousal support.

[73] Also, in April, Ms. Han produced additional documents, primarily text messages, that may be relevant to her claim of spousal support, but were undecipherable to counsel for Mr. Dorje, who does not read Mandarin.

[74] This application proceeded largely on documents selected and translated by counsel for Ms. Han. I was informed that Mandarin translations of the full materials would take 150 days.

[75] Understandably in the circumstances, Mr. Dorje argued that an amendment two months before trial would be neither just nor convenient. He argued that he would be prejudiced by an adjournment so as to allow Ms. Han to advance a late claim of spousal support.

[76] The circumstances changed on May 6, 2021, when Madam Justice Walkem adjourned the trial to July 2022 and reset it for 25 days. Madam Justice Walkem noted that most of the witnesses live internationally and require translators. She also noted that paternity may be in issue, and Mr. Dorje may amend his pleadings to raise that issue. It seems clear that, altogether apart from the potential spousal support claim, the parties were not ready to proceed to trial on June 7, 2021.

[77] In my view, any remaining prejudice to Mr. Dorje is outweighed by the importance of having all of the issues between the parties decided on their merits.

[78] Ms. Han’s delay and changes of position on spousal support may be a matter to de addressed in a future order of costs; but they are not grounds on which to deny her leave to amend the notice of family claim.

CONCLUSION
[79] Ms. Han is granted leave to amend her notice of family claim in the form attached as Appendix A to the notice of application to include a claim for spousal support.

[80] Within 21 days, or such other deadline as the parties may agree, Ms. Han must provide particulars of the marriage-like relationship alleged in the amended notice of family claim.

[81] Ms. Han is entitled to costs of this application in the cause of the spousal support claim.

“Master Elwood”

2021也請多多愛我唷😘
【1月歌單 】好事自在Latte

01/29星期五
2:04:01我討厭你/宇宙人
2:08:01 The Way You Make Me Feel/Michael Jackson
2:15:24學著道別/黃莉/南拳媽媽彈頭
2:19:05完美小姐/徐懷鈺
2:23:30 Lucky One/EXO
2:31:45 I'm Not A Little Girl/李芷婷
2:35:08 Stronger/Kanye West
2:39:59陪妳到最後/易桀齊
2:47:04窒息/李友廷
2:52:35帶我走 帶我走/Dreams Come True

3:04:05海海人生/符瓊音
3:08:37 The Rose/平井堅
3:13:07當你麋鹿/林京燁/黃子佼
3:19:43 Your Body/Christina Aguilera
3:23:38 Walk On Water/鄧紫棋
3:31:35一了百了/信樂團
3:37:02中意他/梁詠琪
3:39:46 YES or YES/TWICE
3:47:49 Marry Me/蕭敬騰
3:53:30 Sing Out/乃木板46

4:04:03彩雲伴海鷗/高勝美
4:07:15 I Have A Dream/ABBA
4:11:46寫一首情歌給我/馬念先
4:17:28 Mood Ring/Britney Spears
4:20:36 Lonely 911/蕭亞軒
4:28:30哈囉/阿杜
4:33:13年輪說/楊丞琳
4:38:43 Fu-Gee-La/Fugees
4:45:54 Follow me/BIGBANG
4:49:23愛的天靈靈/王心凌
4:53:09好想抱著你/強辯樂團

01/28星期四
14:03:59慢半拍/王大文
14:06:52好心情/S.H.E
14:10:16Deja vu/Giorgio MoroderDeja
14:15:45記得回來/韋禮安
14:20:01等等/Olivia Ong
14:23:5424/7/2YOON
14:32:02好愛你。/大塚 愛
14:37:43天真世界的叛徒/理想混蛋
14:46:45懂得雨天/郁可唯
14:52:14Clocks/Coldplay

15:04:06別人的/徐若瑄
15:08:22刻在我心底的名字/盧廣仲
15:13:31Time Is Ticking Out/The Cranberries
15:19:56Shake It/Sistar
15:23:22我要飛/草蜢
15:31:54gift/MONKEY MAJIK
15:36:20不准哭/同恩
15:40:56愛情廢柴/周杰倫
15:48:20敏感/艾怡良
15:52:52Grey/Why Don't We

16:04:06是否/蘇芮
16:08:05空白鍵/許書豪
16:11:33No No/Westlife
16:17:03Don't Start Now/Dua Lipa
16:20:02第五街的誘惑/李玖哲
16:28:07北斗星/溫嵐
16:32:45Beginning/Rain/韶宥
16:37:33喜歡你怎麼辦/王心凌
16:46:12Radioactive/Rita Ora
16:50:22箇中強手/羅志祥
16:53:22I'm Not Yours/蔡依林/安室奈美

01/27星期三
14:03:56蹦蹦蹦/梁心頤
14:07:39想要快樂/杜德偉
14:11:01Spider Man/Michael Buble
14:16:17善男信女/蕭敬騰
14:20:44可樂戒指/梁靜茹
14:25:21Don't Bother/Shakira
14:34:10Babylon/OMI
14:37:27我最搖擺/庾澄慶
14:41:59對的自己/鄭心慈
14:48:32Paparazzi/FTISLAND
14:53:36不敢聽的歌/李千那

15:04:12愛講白賊的查某人/賴慈泓
15:08:06我等你/劉若英
15:12:36Pieces of me/Ashlee Simpson
15:18:35你點的歌救了我/A-Lin/J.Sheon
15:21:59暫時停止呼吸/鼓鼓
15:26:30Rain Over Me/Pitbull
15:35:4534+35/Ariana Grande
15:38:59猜心/萬芳
15:43:44別再想見我/許光漢
15:52:00Jenny珍妮/The Click Five
15:55:19忍不住想念/李佳薇

16:03:56誰會記得我/郭富城
16:08:15終於勇敢了/袁詠琳
16:12:25HUH 嗯哼/4MINUTE
16:18:20叩卡遛/江靜
16:21:51Stressed Out/Twenty One Pilots
16:25:11合拍/郭書瑤
16:33:01走在紅毯那一天/彭佳慧
16:37:24最難的是相遇/吳青峰
16:42:59Still Falling For You/Ellie Goulding
16:49:34愛的數學家/蔣卓嘉
16:51:51我一定會愛上你/梁文音
16:54:16Sugar Lady/河村隆一

01/26星期二
2:04:15 S.O.S/ABBA
2:07:28你要不要吃哈密瓜/告五人
2:11:55看見什麼吃什麼/林宥嘉
2:17:02懂得雨天/郁可唯
2:21:24愛上每一個你/伍思凱
2:26:07 Since We're Alone/Niall Horan
2:34:12 RE-BYE/AKMU 樂童音樂家
2:37:12 Crazy In Love/Emeli Sande
2:41:26抱著你/張震嶽
2:49:25子彈boogie-woogie♂♀/Orange Range
2:53:53珊瑚海/周杰倫/Lara

3:04:05放阮一個人/許富凱
3:07:41你會想念我嗎/蘇慧倫
3:11:40 All That I Need/Boyzone
3:18:03 Future in your eyes/周湯豪
3:20:41 Perfect Illusion/Lady Gaga
3:23:37甜秘密/蔡依林
3:32:03 Free Flight/Dvwn
3:35:28情人節快樂/曹格
3:41:13擁有/棉花糖
3:46:05我愛上你/張學友
3:49:20東東路/魏嘉瑩
3:54:08 Sunshine Girl/moumoon

4:04:06男人不該讓女人流淚/蘇永康
4:08:35只憑接吻/菅田將暉/Aimyon
4:12:13回家路上/戴佩妮
4:17:56 BOOMBAYAH/BLACKPINK
4:22:02蛋裡/王振諾
4:26:26遺失的美好/張韶涵
4:34:53末路狂花/魏如萱
4:39:06 Grey/Why Don't We
4:47:31最高品質靜悄悄/9m88/leo王
4:50:55 Malibu/Miley Cyrus
4:54:42很大的世界/魏妙如/吳健豪

01/25星期一
14:03:57謝謝 夏之戀/KARA
14:07:35Honey/郭書瑤
14:10:4899次我愛他/元若藍
14:16:12我們都寂寞/陳奕迅
14:20:55對的自己/鄭心慈
14:24:43Miles Away/Madonna
14:33:56離開/MC HotDog
14:38:45This Is The Girl/Craig David
14:44:00在一起/安心亞
14:49:43Rainbow Falling/車銀優
14:54:48匆忙人生/楊丞琳

15:04:12花若離枝/蘇芮
15:10:00放棄妳的是我/卓義峰
15:14:32LEAVIN'遠走高飛/Jesse McCartney
15:22:35HWAA/(G)I-DLE
15:25:48戀人殺/陳零九/愷樂
15:29:17大風吹/許慧欣
15:38:09Love is Blind/萬妮達
15:42:32慢靈魂/盧廣仲
15:51:08You Could Be Happy/Snow Patro
15:55:10跳舞到天明/蔡佩軒/Kurt Hug

16:03:56無情的情書/動力火車
16:08:58ON/BTS 防彈少年團
16:12:58我就是喜歡這樣/丁噹
16:19:04一無所知/陳立農/徐佳瑩
16:23:09愛要有你才完美/那英
16:27:49Love Story/Taylor Swift
16:35:54Pump It /The Black Eyed Peas
16:40:34第九夜/李玟
16:47:31愛洗蝦米/旺福
16:52:00I'm a Lady/Meghan Trainor
16:54:41心絲蟲/noovy

01/22星期五
14:04:03Thunderclouds/LSD
14:07:04迷幻/蔡依林
14:10:28Feel Special/TWICE
14:15:40眼淚博物館/鄭興
14:20:24不確定/萬芳
14:24:54Keep On Running/菅田將暉
14:33:0634+35/Ariana Grande
14:35:55Everybody Bounce/高爾宣
14:39:36心有林夕/林宥嘉
14:47:47想要得不到/Tizzy Bac
14:54:36你好嗎/ROY KIM/HUE

15:04:06阿爸/周杰倫/洪榮宏
15:08:26Let Me Love You Like A Woman/Lana Del Rey
15:11:42巴黎草莓/糯米糰
15:18:58公主病/KIMBERLEY 陳芳語
15:22:00Say It Right/Nelly Furtado
15:25:35Face/GOT7
15:33:25大齡女子/彭佳慧
15:39:26Something Beautiful/Robbie WilliamsIn
15:48:08戀人是酒紅色/Aska
15:54:21欠處理/J.Sheon

16:04:06問/陳淑樺
16:08:15眼淚不聽話/安婕希
16:11:40Bop Bop Baby/Westlife
16:18:17Holiday/DJ Antoine/AKon
16:21:13飯隨愛人/邱鋒澤
16:28:49如果有如果/鄧福如
16:36:29The Good Side/Troye Sivan
16:45:52L.I.F.E./Supper Moment
16:51:01愛的黑狗兄/蕭閎仁
16:55:56Breathless/The Corrs

01/21星期四
14:04:02乾啦乾啦/八三夭/任賢齊/阿信
14:06:56All of your life/Backstreet Boys
14:10:44靜止/楊乃文
14:15:58哭過就好了/梁文音
14:20:45Nobody Knows/Standing Egg
14:24:34泡泡氣球島/魏嘉瑩/莊鵑瑛
14:32:57停不下來/Spark/韓睿
14:35:30Trumpet Lights/Chris Brown
14:40:22溫室花朵/陳綺貞
14:49:05Na Na Na/PENTATONIX
14:52:44他是末日預言中的宇宙碎片/陳珊妮

15:04:05酒命怪貓/曹雅雯/草屯囝仔
15:07:25SOSO/徐若瑄/李玖哲
15:10:59Love Game/安室奈美惠
15:17:33A Whole New World/ZAYN/Zhavi
15:21:27可有可無/佛跳牆
15:25:3美麗的力量/小宇-宋念宇
15:33:48Good Love Your Love/DEEP SQUAD
15:37:26蛤/吳克群
15:41:59了不起寂寞/戴愛玲
15:50:50英雄/NCT 127
15:54:40風雲變色/K-ONE/5566

16:04:03忘了你忘了我/王傑
16:08:32醜人多作怪/告五人
16:12:44My Love/The Bird and Bee
16:18:41末愛/Red Velvet
16:23:27第一次/光良
16:32:04火山/伍佰
16:37:23Candy Bling/Mariah Carey
16:45:40文明是一種靈魂裡的蠻荒/Supper Moment
16:50:13我的未來不是夢/茄子蛋
16:52:50What You Waiting for?/Gwen Stefani

01/20星期三
14:03:54Too Many Beautiful Girls/SUPER JUNIOR
14:07:11小男人大男孩/蕭敬騰
14:10:4祝你開心/孫燕姿
14:16:11白色/白安
14:20:03天堂/庾澄慶
14:24:16Things We Lost in the Fire/Bastille
14:32:27我心已打烊/A-Lin
14:35:39I Want You Back/Bananarama
14:40:28千里之外/周杰倫/費玉清
14:48:52鯨落/林采欣
14:54:12NA!NA!NA!/嵐

15:04:13暝那會這呢長/黃小琥
15:08:25Fast Car/Tracy Chapman
15:13:16Ladies &Gentlemen/鍾明軒
15:18:48Good Girl/Carrie Underwood
15:22:10有沒有妹/黃鴻升
15:31:00Real Groove/Kylie Minogue
15:35:17雨人/周華健
15:39:17沒有不可能/江美琪
15:48:13自躁浪漫/李英宏/李權哲
15:54:08Soul Flower/Tasha

16:03:59紅塵來去一場夢/巫啟賢
16:08:22You Are/于文文
16:12:58Be With You/Atomic Kitten
16:18:43Symphony/Zara Larsson
16:22:12Fly Tonight/袁詠琳
16:29:27愛人動物/蘇打綠
16:33:13還是要幸福/田馥甄
16:38:53Killer Tune/東京事變
16:46:45Here I Come/Supper Moment
16:50:22晨之歌/Lulu黃路梓茵
16:53:18THAT'S NOT MY NAME/聽聽樂團

01/19星期二
2:04:40 Happy Together/Simple Plan
2:07:09認真就輸了/八三夭
2:10:32AZAAR/張靚穎
2:16:03寂寞在唱歌/阿桑
2:20:28何妨/家家/茄子蛋
2:24:53聽到這首歌就回來/2PM
2:32:25滑步向左/比莉
2:36:10 Real Groove/Kylie Minogue
2:40:36忠孝東路走九遍/每次都想呼喊你的名字/動力火車
2:50:54 Timing/平井堅
2:54:34誓言/徐懷鈺

3:04:06你聽我說/草爺
3:08:55世界末日/信樂團
3:13:27 REAL LOVE/Jess Glynne
3:18:43有點甜/汪蘇瀧/By2
3:22:19甜蜜花園/林依晨
3:25:52戀/星野 源
3:34:31遊樂園/伯賢
3:39:47 野蠻遊戲/蔡依林
3:47:01夜盲症/蔡健雅
3:51:52 Bloom/Troye Sivan
3:55:26信號/GTM

4:04:03領悟/辛曉琪
4:08:48 Love Love Love/James Blunt
4:12:16愛情萬歲/五月天
4:20:12愛她沒的救/杜德偉/品冠、曹格 阿牛
4:23:52 Shake It/Sistar
4:27:17 Champagne Problems/Meghan Trainor
4:34:52領空/傅健穎
4:39:09別說/李玖哲
4:45:07 Anything Goes/Tony Bennett/Lady GaGa
4:50:54祈/Supper Moment
4:53:57 Follow You Down/Zedd

01/18星期一
2:03:54 I have a Dream/Connie Talbot
2:08:19現在就出發/品冠
2:11:35愛的叮咚/徐懷鈺
2:17:05愚人的國度/孫燕姿
2:20:59沒有雨聲的日子/四分衛
2:25:27我這樣的男人/CNBLUE
2:33:20 Don't Go Away/Fun Factory
2:36:43 Woosa Woosa/王心凌
2:41:17念念又不忘/李榮浩
2:50:42當你老了/莫文蔚
2:54:30 Bounce/Hey! Say! JUMP

3:05:09老伴/豬哥亮
3:09:08 Everything/Michael Buble
3:12:31 Na Ni/范曉萱/福祿壽
3:20:47 Higher/吳卓源
3:24:20 Hey Boy/Sia
3:26:45我的時代/MC HotDog/張震嶽
3:34:46藍色天空/九九
3:38:45末日之戀/張智成
3:44:11 Give Me Everything/Pitbull/Ne-Yo
3:52:02怦怦跳/金民勝
3:55:20愛上愛的味道/張韶涵

4:03:59永遠等待/順子
4:08:38空白鍵/許書豪
4:12:06 This Love/Maroon 5
4:17:31哎呀! AIYA!/Karencici
4:19:46 This Is What You Came For/Calvin Harris/Rihhana
4:23:23辦不到/張靚穎/大嘴巴
4:30:58你不在/王力宏
4:35:26那天以後/張娜拉/池義變
4:40:59旅行公路/小男孩樂團
4:49:00 Yes I do/Supper Moment
4:53:39 Together/MONKEY MAJIK

01/15星期五
14:04:03娛樂無限公司/Ella 陳嘉樺
14:07:31In Your Arms/Backstreet Boys
14:11:03紅粉寶貝/汪佩蓉
14:16:16世界唯一的你/曹格
14:20:45Everything/小男孩樂團
14:24:48DON'T HATE ME/EPIK HIGH
14:32:58Can I Get a Moment?/Jessica Mauboy
14:36:20Feel Good/謝和弦/KIMBERLE陳芳語
14:40:41胡鬧/吳克群
14:50:20Still Lovin' You/安室奈美惠
14:55:32胖子/自由發揮

15:04:05歡喜就好/陳雷
15:07:25Objection/Shakira
15:11:06芳華絕代/梅艷芳/張國榮
15:19:27為你幸福過的我/戴愛玲
15:23:59說好的幸福呢/周杰倫
15:28:07Rose/ LEE HI
15:35:52飄浮/柯泯薰
15:41:19The Animal Song/Savage Garden
15:50:07出口/徐佳瑩
15:54:13FULL MOON/三代目 登板廣臣

16:04:03因為寂寞/李宗盛
16:07:20騙人，不！/周蕙
16:10:57Chunky/Bruno Mars
16:16:16差不多先生/MC HotDog熱狗
16:20:40Believer/Imagine Dragons
16:28:23也許/林憶蓮
16:34:57傻瓜與野丫頭/張宇/徐熙娣
16:39:07Twenty-three/IU
16:47:24玩家/曹楊/派偉俊
16:50:46SPOTLIGHT/頑童MJ116
16:54:17I'm Ready/Sam Smith/Demi Lovato

01/14星期四
14:04:30I Move On/Chicago
14:08:251234567/F.I.R.飛兒樂團
14:11:46華麗舞台/草蜢
14:16:51在那個冬天的下午，我愛你/萬芳
14:21:15故事/蘇打綠
14:25:44DNA/BTS 防彈少年團
14:33:36Girls/Rita Ora/Charli XCX
14:38:11情書/范逸臣
14:41:50如果你愛我/艾怡良
14:49:56我愛夏天/脫拉庫
14:54:28甜蜜病症/椎名林檎

15:04:06狡怪囡仔/康康
15:07:58真想見到你/李玟
15:13:06Bang!/After School
15:19:29不安室的奈美惠/炎亞綸/吳卓源
15:23:10Click Flash/Ciara 席亞拉
15:31:35if/雨的遊行
15:36:04夢醒了/那英/王菲
15:40:10你是最美的/王語昕
15:48:20人間煙火/田馥甄
15:53:29YMCA/Village People

16:04:06灰色雨滴/趙詠華
16:08:19Falling/Harry Style
16:12:05心引力 You&Me/廖柏雅
16:17:49等不及/徐懷鈺
16:21:42Hips Don't Lie/Shakira
16:29:23透明/鄧紫棋
16:32:52美麗/王大文
16:37:47一直都喜歡你/齊藤和義
16:46:37機場/曹楊
16:51:22凝望/江美琪
16:54:58Amazing-Bad Lady/Cross Gene

01/13星期三
14:03:56溫度/929
14:10:33我們只有星期六/氣志團
14:18:00我很好/劉若英
14:22:22愛上一個女孩/許書豪
14:25:29Hurts/Emeli Sande
14:32:31Beep Beep/BTOB
14:35:57Be Strong/派偉俊
14:40:15感情生活/王菲
14:49:09NaKuNa/郭采潔
14:53:32We Didn't Start The Fire/Billy Joel

15:04:12天荒地老/荒山亮
15:09:05五天幾年/林凡
15:12:53MILLION MILES/Kylie Minogue
15:18:42Rehab/Amy Winehouse
15:22:31十二生肖/王力宏
15:31:13Body/Megan Thee Stallion
15:35:02威尼斯的淚/永邦
15:39:35你好．再見/Sistar-孝琳
15:46:48愛之船/馬念先
15:50:07我沒有用， 沒辦法給你想要的生活/怕胖團
15:53:55FREE FREE/鈴木亞美

16:03:56Cha Cha舞池/四大天王
16:08:01A-CHA/SUPER JUNIOR
16:13:25運氣來的若有似無/告五人
16:17:48Summer/陳昇
16:24:12I'm In Love/JTR
16:31:23心理遊戲/陳曉東
16:35:32Blanco/Pitbull
16:39:59路痴/楊乃文
16:49:40妳說妳還不了/曹楊
16:53:42Killing Me Softly With His Song/Fugees

01/12星期二
14:04:58太陽升起/浪花兄弟
14:08:49Touch My Body/Sistar
14:12:13Save you tonight/One Direction
14:17:14安靜/周杰倫
14:22:39不安室的奈美惠/炎亞綸/吳卓源
14:26:19Say So/Doja Cat/Nicki
14:33:26記憶/MISIA 米希亞
14:39:24奇怪的帽子/關吉吉
14:43:33荷里活/曹格
14:50:29B.O./OZI/9m88
14:55:02We've Got It Going On/Backstreet Boys

15:04:05軋車/五月天
15:06:38When They Come For Me/Linkin Park
15:11:28One by one oh We're Gonna Die/Tizzy Bac
15:19:13Love You Lately/Daniel Powter
15:22:07你是最美的/王語昕
15:26:39愛情條約/張宇
15:34:51Hop in/嚴正化/華莎
15:38:25戰神/MP 魔幻力量
15:43:27平凡之路/朴樹
15:51:41Prisoner/Miley Cyrus
15:54:27獨一無二/羅志祥

16:04:06知己/周慧敏/邰正宵
16:08:58為我好/Crispy脆樂團
16:13:04Staring At The Stars/Passenger
16:18:44甩一甩/葛仲珊/比莉
16:22:29Dangerous/Michael Jackson
16:29:31眼淚不聽話/安婕希
16:36:50Sweet Girl/B1A4
16:41:57三個人的晚餐/王若琳
16:50:26走散/曹楊
16:54:42Lovers in Japan/Coldplay

01/11星期一
14:03:56愛的動名片/安心亞
14:07:07Luv Me/AOA
14:10:33媽媽說/周渝民
14:15:27聽見下雨的聲音/魏如昀
14:19:54小時候的我們/周興哲
14:23:15Silhouette/Tom Odell
14:32:01Get The Party Started/P!nk
14:35:45少在那邊/葉瑋庭/賴聖恩
14:40:14先得方/鼓鼓/萬芳
14:49:02永遠在身邊/大嘴巴
14:53:36Super Delicate/Hey! Say! JUMP

15:04:12啞巴情歌/黃乙玲
15:08:16獨處的時候/蘇打綠
15:12:40 報告那個班長/謝和弦
15:18:54BAD LADY/楊丞琳
15:22:05Gangnam Style/Psy
15:25:37And No Matches/Scooter
15:34:00赤裸真相/蕭亞軒
15:39:00下雨天/張傑
15:43:30Don't Know Why/平井堅
15:50:29牛仔很忙/周杰倫
15:54:20This Is The Last Time/Keane

16:03:56忘了時間的鐘/古巨基
16:07:14Lucky/Jason Mraz
16:10:15我的左耳/舒米恩
16:15:11Dirrty/Christina Aguilera
16:19:05皇后區的皇后/葛仲珊
16:22:02LOVE GUN/Nissy
16:29:31懼高症/徐佳瑩
16:33:50NaKuNa/郭采潔
16:38:13When The Going Gets Tough/Boyzone
16:46:04多一天/曹楊/劉明湘
16:50:16無限大/孫燕姿
16:54:19No Vacancy/One Republic

01/08星期五
2:04:52 PMLet It Go/Idina Menzel
2:08:26 PM青山在/莫文蔚
2:12:50 PMMoi J'aime skier/Pigloo
2:17:28 PM就站在這裡/小宇-宋念宇
2:21:51 PMBeautiful/Crush
2:25:28 PM女孩, 你想要什麼呢?/PIA吳蓓雅
2:33:17 PM三秒笑/江靜
2:37:07 PMThe Cure/Lady Gagae
2:41:40 PM衝動/動力火車
2:50:12 PM房客/呂婕菲
2:53:40 PMI Love You, Sayonara/倖田來未

3:04:06 PM唉喲唉喲/江蕙
3:08:11 PM對面的女孩看過來/任賢齊
3:11:10 PMLiar/Camila Cabello
3:16:49 PMIn Your Time/李秀賢
3:21:08 PM獨家記憶/陳小春
3:26:04 PM假的假的/胖球/斯拉
3:33:04 PM地球上最浪漫的一首歌/黃鴻升
3:38:48 PMWorth It/Fifth Harmony
3:42:29 PM辣台妹/頑童MJ116
3:50:18 PM我這個人/艾怡良
3:56:04 PM喧嘩上等/東京事變

4:04:06 PM忙與盲/張艾嘉
4:08:31 PM以詩之名/路嘉欣
4:12:12 PM櫻花女孩/NEWS
4:18:54 PM我愛的人不愛我/張智成
4:23:07 PM目光/魏如昀
4:26:52 PMTalk Love/K.Will
4:34:34 PMTurn Up The Radio/Madonna
4:38:12 PM城市狂響/許書豪
4:42:56 PM雪咧飛/黃妃
4:51:18 PMSussudio/Phil Collins
4:55:27 PM情花開/張棟樑

01/07星期四
14:04:41大俠艾吃漢堡包/艾成
14:08:28不吃早餐才是一件很嘻哈的事/MC HotDog
14:12:43速食餐(Fast food song)/素食搖滾客
14:17:26愛情海/梁詠琪
14:21:55Goodbye My Friends/生命樹樂團
14:26:03Heaven/FT ISLAND
14:33:29Sexy Sexy Lover/Modern Talking
14:36:29愈慢愈美麗/蔡依林
14:40:35愛，很簡單/陶吉吉
14:49:40想見你/德永英明
14:54:25我只想在乎我在乎的/白安

15:04:04Beautiful的你莫走/七月半
15:08:21咖啡戀曲/旺福
15:12:19泳池畔的美人魚/V6
15:18:52那年夏天寧靜的海/王心凌i
15:22:57有一種愛叫等待/邱鋒澤
15:26:51A Sky Full Of Stars/Coldplay
15:35:16東京路人甲/I Don't Like Monday
15:39:29Afterglow/Ed Sheeran
15:42:30狂戀/陳綺貞
15:49:33I Say Baby/周湯豪
15:53:59Fast Car/Jonas Blue/Dakota

16:04:03相思成災/劉德華
16:08:39如果那天/林凡
16:11:57LATATA/(G)I-DLE
16:17:37變心記/蔡旻佑
16:21:13神隊友/慢慢說樂團
16:24:37Pussy Cat/Lou Bega
16:31:55鋼琴鍵/戴佩妮
16:35:43天天夜夜/F.I.R.飛兒樂團
16:41:33Too Much/Carly Rae Jepse
16:48:13That's What I Like/Bruno Mars
16:51:35沒辦法/黃立成/Machi
16:54:54NoNoNo/APINK

01/06星期三
2:04:31 PM笑一個/浩角翔起
2:08:08 PMCha Cha Cha/Humo feat Josef
2:11:32 PM失戀陣線聯盟/草蜢
2:16:01 PMSomeone Over The Rainbow/許哲珮/莫子儀
2:19:56 PM空位/張信哲
2:24:47 PMMORE & MORE/TWICE
2:32:09 PMNo Good For You/Meghan Trainor
2:35:41 PM獨上C樓/YELLOW黃宣/范曉萱
2:40:33 PM孤獨患者/陳奕迅
2:48:36 PMYes I do/Supper Moment
2:53:49 PMChocolate Disco/Perfume

3:04:12 PM真心換絕情/吳宗憲
3:09:06 PM少了一件牛仔褲/閻奕格
3:13:35 PMNext To You/Chris Brown
3:19:43 PM狠狠愛/徐若瑄
3:23:13 PM麻木/王大文
3:25:23 PMPop Star/平井堅
3:34:45 PMMatches/Britney Spears Glory
3:38:40 PM有故事的人/周華健
3:43:09 PM 你是最美的/王語昕
3:50:28 PM防空洞/蘇慧倫/張震嶽
3:56:08 PMA/GOT7

4:03:59 PM相思爬上心底/鳳飛飛
4:06:54 PM愛情黑皮書/庾澄慶
4:10:51 PM人生Blues/早安少女組
4:17:01 PM溫柔時空/陳立農
4:21:11 PM我不再怕/梁心頤
4:25:21 PMNot Today_Feat_Eve/Mary J. Blige
4:33:29 PMSwing/U-KNOW允浩/BoA
4:36:48 PM薇多莉亞的秘密/張惠妹
4:40:33 PM對等關係/HUSH
4:49:53 PM管他啦/Matzka
4:53:28 PMCome As You Are/Santana

01/05星期二
14:03:59小女孩/張芸京
14:08:00As I Am/Miley Cyrus
14:11:35自己人/鼓鼓
14:16:09自己照顧自己/萬芳
14:20:11嘿 親愛的/陳勢安
14:25:25Hands on Me/少女時代-太妍
14:32:45Lonely Together/Rita Ora
14:35:42沒什麼不能愛/曾沛慈
14:40:42諾亞方舟/五月天
14:49:39Afterglow/Ed Sheeran
14:53:47土耳其冰淇淋/周杰倫
14:56:57Birthday Cake/Rihanna

15:04:05純情青春夢/許富凱
15:09:13Love Story/安室奈美惠
15:13:47怨偶/MC HotDog/艾怡良
15:18:45Stranger/Hilary Duff
15:22:52JioJioMe/黃明志
15:25:49TeBaGiYa!/BIGBANG-大成
15:33:46What Do I Call You/太妍
15:37:37葉子/阿桑
15:42:16小情歌/蘇打綠
15:49:56Goodbye My Friends/生命樹樂團
15:55:11I Heard A Rumour/Bananarama

16:04:03每一次喊你/無印良品
16:07:51過去、現在和未來/CNBLUE
16:11:34小姐請你乎我愛/梁文音/六甲樂團
16:16:25CAN'T STOP THE FEELING!/Justin Timberlack
16:20:17愛tears/Nissy西島隆弘
16:23:40來個蹦蹦/玖壹壹/Ella 陳嘉樺
16:30:33相信/孫燕姿
16:34:55不搖滾/八三夭/房東的貓不搖滾
16:40:40Sing It Out Loud/OMI
16:47:34親愛的/潘瑋柏
16:51:29初戀粉色系/南拳媽媽
16:55:05Celebrate/Mika

01/04星期一
2:04:32 PMPOSTCARDS /James Blunt
2:09:13 PM超級喜歡/卓文萱
2:12:11 PM只想說，謝謝妳/MONKEY MAJIK
2:17:00 PMYes I do/Supper Moment
2:21:39 PM我是如此愛你/林慧萍
2:26:16 PMLUCKY GUY/金賢重
2:33:25 PMGet Your Number/Mariah Carey
2:36:37 PM你知道這不是愛/蔡詩蕓
2:40:53 PM想你了/光良
2:48:32 PM舞女/岑寧兒
2:52:39 PM心動/庾澄慶
2:55:36 PMWho Says /Selena Gomez/ The Sence

3:04:13 PM愛情甜甜/孫淑媚
3:08:01 PM中意他/梁詠琪
3:10:47 PM夢話/NU'EST
3:17:37 PM下一個永遠/張信哲
3:22:18 PMWrong Direction/Hailee Steinfel
3:26:13 PMRadio/黃文星
3:34:18 PM魔法BOY/春艷/持修
3:37:33 PM不要不要/陳珊妮/魏如萱
3:41:49 PMNA!NA!NA!/嵐
3:46:30 PM有一種悲傷/A-Lin
3:50:17 PMMake You Feel My Love/Adele
3:53:42 PM我就喜歡/王力宏

4:03:59 PM出去走走/張震嶽
4:07:31 PMWonderland/倖田來未
4:10:50 PM翹翹板/吳汶芳
4:16:13 PM不愛自己的人/蔡佩軒
4:20:04 PM日日夜夜/張棟樑
4:24:47 PMGorgeous/Taylor Swift
4:32:00 PMHow You Like That/BLACKPINK
4:34:55 PM一支獨秀/羅志祥
4:39:07 PM第一個想到你/韋禮安
4:47:52 PM雪咧飛/黃妃
4:52:33 PMI'll Be There For You/Bon Jovi

01/01星期五
14:04:03Gone/Nsync
14:08:33囉哩叭唆/Ella 陳嘉樺
14:12:00嗨嗨人生/MC HotDog/張震嶽
14:17:23愛神的箭/林俊逸
14:21:02這一刻/IU
14:23:51漂亮一點/蔡健雅
14:30:58positions/Ariana Grande
14:33:47放閃/溫嵐
14:38:13換日線/張智成
14:46:53PaTing/柯泯薰
14:51:50Why/平井堅

15:04:05愛我三分鐘/江蕙
15:07:59愛的嘉卡芭娜/NEWS
15:12:15Chillaxing/安心亞
15:18:52非你莫屬/TANK
15:23:36如何忘記你/張若凡
15:28:31Mas/Ricky Martin
15:36:33天降辣妹/小男孩樂團
15:40:28你離開他了嗎/曾沛慈
15:44:33Always Be My Baby/Mariah Carey
15:52:11Slide/葛仲珊
15:54:48BOOMERANG/Wanna One

16:04:03你看你看月亮的臉/孟庭葦
16:07:54在呼喊妳的名字之後/槙原敬之
16:12:23浮世繪/李幸倪
16:17:55Watermelon Sugar/Harry Styles
16:20:48翻轉壞未來/李依瑾
16:24:31Never Give Up/神話
16:32:23如果能幸福/周興哲
16:37:12Realize/Colbie Caillat
16:41:00一事無成的偉大/八三夭
16:50:54God Is A Dancer/Tiesto/Mabel
16:53:41365天/JPM

#歌單
#好事989BESTRADIO

Hello my subbies :)

Another day of vlogging whilst hanging around in London. I'm personally on a journey to hopefully get fitter for my Maldives trip!

Workout : Barry's Bootcamp Central
Trainers @faisalpmafitness

Abs Day
6 rounds of treadmill sessions, ranging from approximately 5-7 minutes.
- Interval sprints (maximum speed 12.5 mph / 20kph)
- Inclined runs
- Long distance steady running

6 rounds of core workout
- Leg raises
- Crunches
- Walking/Side Planks
- Weighted Sit ups
- Russian Twists
- Bicycle Crunch

Alternating between the two - treadmill, core work, until the end of the class

__________________________________________________________________________

My transformation video - How I Lost 46 Pounds:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wrw5LjQZzlM&t=10s


Gogreengolean ?

?? FOLLOW ME

➤ BLOG: https://gogreengolean.wordpress.com/
➤ INSTAGRAM: GoGreenGoLean
➤ E-MAIL: st00227@gmail.com

Get ‘Asiany’ Merch at our new merch store!: https://standard.tv/kentobento

Support us on Patreon: https://patreon.com/kentobento

★ Flipping Up Schoolgirl's Skirt By Running EXPLAINED | Anime vs Reality: https://youtu.be/h4w5mUY9gQQ
★ 5 WEIRD Chinese Beauty Trends on Social Media: https://youtu.be/a6o905aJt2k
★ 5 EPIC Japanese Commercials Involving High School Girls: https://youtu.be/p84JKiBIRcU
★ 5 WEIRD Japanese Food Trends on Social Media: https://youtu.be/ozp9SjNJa0c
★ 7 WACKY Things You May Not Know About JAPANESE CONDOMS: https://youtu.be/RKfIAggjomo
★ 3 MOST POPULAR Japanese Romantic Gestures: https://youtu.be/Y9izbafHrlQ

------------------

► JAPANESE CANDY & SNACK SUBSCRIPTION BOX (TOKYO TREAT WEBSITE):
https://tokyotreat.refersion.com/c/f4... (affiliate)
COUPON CODE: KENTOBENTO7 (9% discount off first premium box)
*FREE shipping worldwide

- Here's a video of us unboxing a Tokyo Treat box: https://youtu.be/k2-zl5rM9_c


► MIGHTY MUG WEBSITE: http://bit.ly/2tjjkzI (affiliate)
*Get the mug that won't fall over! It's UN-SPILLABLE!*

- We test out the Mighty Mug at the end of this video: https://youtu.be/pgHiRsk2UjY

-----------------

Available Subtitles: ENGLISH, FRENCH, SWEDISH
(Credits: chaimae b., Commander)
► If you want to help subtitle this video into your native language, please let us know so we can give you credit~ http://www.youtube.com/timedtext_video?ref=share&v=OIgseSQnciU

-----------------

6 PROVOCATIVE JAPANESE TRENDS ON SOECIAL MEDIA

So we've done a couple of videos on Weird Chinese Beauty Trends on Social Media. Now it's Japan's turn.

Provocative, revealing and risqué social media trends from Japan, from least to most provocative. Sorry if this video makes you uncomfortable....

1. Baby Peach Butts
- Japanese moms are taking picture of their baby's butts covered with a peach.

2. Cosplay Undressed
- Leaving your cosplay costume outside the bathroom door to make it look like that character is taking a bath / shower.

3. Under-the-Boob Challenge
- Actually originated in Japan, but once Chinese social media took a hold of it, it went global.

4. Under-the-Ribbon Challenge
- from Hestia in the anime 'Is It Wrong To Pick Up Girls In A Dungeon?'
- Real life boost to your boobs / breasts?

5. Legs During Golden Week
- #ShowLegToShowSupportForSalarymen created by Japanese women who want to support the hardworking men who don't get time off during Japan's Golden Week.

6. Party Monster Dance
- My god, this is the most extreme...just watch the video


Which ones were TOO risqué for you?


Thanks for watching! And if you enjoyed this video, don't forget to LIKE, SHARE & SUBSCRIBE ^^

SOCIAL MEDIA
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/kentobento2015
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/kentobento2015
AMWF

Hey Everyone!!!! So for today, I got the weekend off. We did sort of a big grocery shopping today. It is the first real grocery shopping in a long while. The Pay Day Friday before we did not do a real grocery shop so we were running low on stuff. Matthew had to work today. I hope you guys had a lovely first day of Spring. Thanks for watching & supporting my Channel.