Reposting a snippet from my latest blog post, you can read the full article here: http://xiaxue.blogspot.com/2020/07/raeesah-khan-ge-2020-and-being-labeled.html?m=1
I’m posting more about Raeesah Khan today.
First, a disclaimer. I do not dislike the Worker’s Party.
Of all the opposition parties, I think they are the best. I live in Aljunied grc, and they have done a great job so far. I agree with many of the policy suggestions in their manifesto.
For example, redundancy insurance, abolishing the retirement age, or lowering the age of eligibility for BTO flats, which will help singles and our LGBTQ community to get housing just like married couples are.
Previously I mentioned on my ig stories that Raeesah Khan is not suitable to be an MP.
Today I am going to ask some very important questions which I hope both WP and Raeesah will answer.
I refer to this tweet by Raeesah in the photos.
It appears that she is saying her political views can be summed up by
- Angela Davis’ political views
- Intersectional feminism
Many of you may not know about Angela Davis, but she is a far-left activist, who spent her life sympathising with some of the most oppressive communism regimes around.
She literally calls herself a communist, and was a member of the Communism Party in USA. I think there is no need to explain how horrible communism is.
And of course in order to make any non-communist country a communist state, it would involve total revolution, many lives, and replacing it with a totalitarian regime in charge of redistributing wealth back to its citizens.
She is also a prison abolitionist, campaigning for prisons to completely be eradicated. Where to put the murderers, I can’t seem to find a good answer, because it seems she also is against the death penalty.
Angela Davis was a member of the Black Panthers, a brutal communist, anti-semite organization. In 1970, Angela Davis bought the weapons that were used for a shootout during a trial of 3 black inmates accused of killing a white prison guard. All the black men and judge who was held hostage perished in the gunfight, and Davis fled the state. She was eventually caught.
Even though she conspired to commit murder, the jury found her not guilty.
In short, this woman is the antithesis to the Singapore that Mr Lee Kuan Yew wanted.
This tweet of Raeesah Khan’s talking about Angela Davis was posted only a few weeks ago, but surprisingly enough, nobody is talking about it.
Anyone who knows who Angela Davis is should be horror-filled that a candidate running for parliament is a fan of hers, and claims that the reading of her books represents her political views.
Previously I mentioned Raeesah appears to be one of those radical leftists who seem hell bent on bringing the toxic, cancerous identity politics that America is so notorious for into Singapore.
There are racial issues that minorities face in Singapore, of course there is. It is tough to be a minority in any country.
But instead of discussing calmly and logically what new politics can be introduced to solve these problems or what laws need to change, proponents of Identity politics instead try to make a single race the enemy.
When there are enemies, people unite. Political parties using this method will see themselves get votes if they manage to market themselves as the empathetic ones, even if the politics they impose do more evil than good in the long run.
Society is then split into a them vs us, while tribalistic infighting ensue. If you disagree with this method of classifying victims by their skin colour (when in fact so many things determine a person’s privilege, such as looks, height, family wealth, health, both parents around etc etc), you are automatically seen as racist and the bad guy.
Because nobody wants to seem morally corrupt or unsympathetic, they prop up this system.
Instill this sentiment into citizens long enough and resentment builds. The ones constantly told they are being oppressed will start seeing oppression everywhere. They won’t even try to succeed in life, because they are told they are so oppressed they can never make it. They believe their oppressors owe them.
Meanwhile, the majority race starts feeling angry at constantly being called oppressors. Or maybe they are poor and unhappy themselves, but see that resources for help are only made available for minorities but not them. If they were indeed racist before, this makes them even more racist.
What eventually happens is civil war. We cannot have this poison in Singapore.
Raeesah’s has apologised for her posts, but nobody needed to hear whether she is sorry she was being insensitive.
What people need to know is:
Does she still believe our courts are corrupt as she so insinuated? Does she still believe law enforcement unfairly target minorities? If not, what made her change her mind? Her statement does not address any of this.
Worker’s Party claim they did not see those posts of Raeesah’s. Fair enough. But I do not believe they have done such terrible vetting that they have not seen her tweet about Angela Davis which was so recent.
I wish to ask Raeesah Khan, DO YOU DISAVOW ANGELA DAVIS’ POLITICAL VIEWS?
- Do you believe that Singapore, through a brutal revolution and death, can become a communist utopia?
- Do you think that everyone in Singapore should not own private property and should have equal wealth, the very values communism epouses? If so, do you seek to redistribute your multi-millionaire dad's wealth to the poverty-stricken citizens of Singapore?
- Do you agree that it is only with violence and death do we achieve true freedom?
- Do you seek to abolish prisons in Singapore?
- Do you believe in the ideologies of Karl Marx, or Valdamir Lenin?
As for Worker’s Party, why did you field a candidate who holds extreme left-wing views?
Do you agree with her ideologies and think it aligns with yours? DO YOU ENDORSE THESE FAR LEFT VIEWS??
Please answer these questions. I write all these not because I am a PAP lackey, even though obviously people will say I am. Despite what you think, I believe it is healthy to have opposition seats in parliament.
However, I absolutely do not want to see candidates such as Raeesah Khan in our parliament - she brings with her dangerous political views that can topple the peaceful society we built over the years and is completely against everything that Singapore stands for. As it is, the mindless youth of Singapore are already echoing her dangerous ideologies.
I would rather any opposition joker win than her.
同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過0的網紅TO G,也在其Youtube影片中提到,最近,废死刑议题再次在马来西亚引起民众热烈的讨论 可能很多人并不了解什么是”废死刑“,所以今天这个影片让大家可以了解支持废死刑的人,到底在想些什么。 在做这个影片之前我已经预感会有很多负评,但是我还是想拍出来,因为我想可能很多人从一开始就拒绝对废死刑的任何信息,思考和了解,就好像认识一个人,一开始就...
「abolish death penalty」的推薦目錄:
abolish death penalty 在 Eric's English Lounge Facebook 的最佳解答
[時事英文] The Death Penalty
剛剛看完大家熱烈討論的《我們與惡的距離》The World Between Us 覺得學到不少東西,劇情也直接挑戰大眾對死刑和相關議題的看法。好,點到為止,我就不透漏劇情了。
以下是我編寫關於死刑的一篇文章。無論大家觀點如何,希望以下提供的一些資訊可以幫同學學習英文,關心社會大事及更了解此議題。
★★★★★★★★★★★★
錄音檔: http://bit.ly/2vh27ph
★★★★★★★★★★★★
以下老師提供執行死刑的支持和反對的論點的相關的英文單字及文章,目的是希望幫助各位不論是在英文口試上更得心應手,另外了解正反兩方的觀點也才能讓各位的辯證更有說服力。
時事詞彙:
pros and cons 利弊
capital punishment/the death penalty 死刑
retribution 應報
state power 國家公權力
deprive…of their right to live 剝奪…生命權
separate them from society 使其永久與社會隔離
the abolition of the death penalty 廢除死刑
do away with 除去;廢除
concepts of law and order 法治觀念
popular consensus and support 民眾之共識與支持
opinion polls 民意調查
respondents 受訪者
complementary measures 相關配套措施
increase upper sentencing limits 提高有期徒刑上限
the threshold for parole for life imprisonment 無期徒刑假釋門檻
amendments 法律修正案
human rights protection 人權之保障
maintaining public security 治安之維護
cruel, inhumane 殘酷, 不人道
on death row 在死刑名單上
administer the death penalty 執行死刑
approve all executions 批准處決
method of execution 行刑方式
hanging 絞刑
retain the death penalty 維持死刑
carry out death penalty 執行死刑
a deterrent to crime or extremism 遏止犯罪或極端主義
lethal injection 致命注射
appeal 上訴; 請求
Taiwan Alliance to End the Death Penalty 台灣廢死聯盟
★★★★★★★★★★★★
Pros and Cons of the Death Penalty 死刑的利與弊
★★★★★★★★★★★★
Arguments commonly made for supporting the death penalty are:
一般常會被用來支持死刑應該存在的論點如下:
1. To serve as an example to other would-be criminals, to deter them from committing murder or terrorist acts.
會對那些相當可能犯案的潛在罪犯產生警示的作用,並阻止他們犯下任何謀殺或恐怖行為。
2. To punish the criminal for his/her act.
由於他們的犯罪行為,給予懲罰。
3. To obtain retribution on behalf of the victims.
基於受害者的權益,罪犯應當得到相對的懲罰。
★★★★★★★★★★★★
Arguments Against 反駁論點
Arguments commonly made to abolish the death penalty are:
一般常會被用來支持死刑應該被廢除的論點如下:
1. Death constitutes “cruel and unusual punishment" and the various means used by the state to kill a criminal are cruel.
死刑的構成其實是殘暴而且不尋常的處罰,再者,目前國家執行死刑的方式,有很多都是非常殘忍的。
2. The death penalty is used disproportionately against the poor, who cannot afford expensive legal counsel, as well as against racial, ethnic and religious minorities.
相對於金字塔頂端的富人,由於那些貧窮的社會階層根本負擔不起昂貴的律師費用,死刑的執行對於他們而言,完全不成比例,另一方面,其實那些種族、少數民族和宗教等弱勢團體也面臨著類似的問題。
3. Wrongly convicted, innocent people have received death penalty sentences, and tragically, were killed by the state.
法律上誤判的狀況,也會導致無辜的人們被判處死刑,因而不幸地被國家殺害。
4. A rehabilitated criminal can make a morally valuable contribution to society.
一位改過自新的罪犯,其實也能就道德層面當中,對這個社會有一些難能可貴的貢獻。
★★★★★★★★★★★★
English and Chinese Script:
The death penalty, with its basis in the theory of retribution, uses state power to deprive convicted criminals of their right to live and separate them from society forever. Since capital punishment is cruel and goes against the notion that punishment should encompass education, the abolition of the death penalty has gradually become a global trend. Many democratic and industrialized countries have completely or conditionally abolished the death penalty.
死刑起源於報應主義,係以國家公權力剝奪罪犯生命權,使其永久與社會隔離,由於手段殘酷,不符刑罰亦具教化之主張,故廢除死刑已漸是世界潮流,許多民主先進國家已廢除死刑或有條件的廢除死刑。
Whether to completely do away with the death penalty depends on the development of society, the maturity of concepts of law and order and popular consensus and support. In opinion polls in recent years, around 80% of respondents have consistently opposed the abolition of the death penalty. Opposition falls to 40% however if complementary measures such as increases in upper sentencing limits and the threshold for parole for life imprisonment are included.
惟是否全面廢除死刑,應視社會發展、法治觀念是否成熟及民眾之共識與支持。根據歷年來所做之相關民意調查,民眾對我國廢止死刑之意見,始終約有百分之八十的受訪者表示反對。但如有相關配套措施,例如提高有期徒刑上限、無期徒刑假釋門檻等,反對意見則約下降至百分之四十。
Evidently, with consideration of complementary measures and education, public support for retribution may be reoriented and a general consensus formed on the gradual abolition of the death penalty.
可見如有配套措施,並透過教育導正民眾報復思想,應可逐步凝聚廢除死刑之社會共識。
The Ministry of Justice will employ extensive discussion and research to form a popular consensus for abolition, and only then propose the necessary amendments to existing laws to extend human rights protection while maintaining public security.
法務部將會透過廣泛討論與研究,凝聚多數民眾支持廢除死刑之共識後,才會提出廢除死刑的法律修正案,以兼顧人權之保障及治安之維護。
★★★★★★★★★★★★
Article source: 中華民國法務部有關廢除死刑之政策
http://www.moj.gov.tw/fp.asp?xItem=26742&ctNode=28252
Image source: https://opinion.udn.com/opinion/story/10043/3613790
★★★★★★★★★★★★
時事英文: https://bit.ly/2Gtsduy
abolish death penalty 在 《海琪的天空》 陳海琪 Facebook 的最佳解答
【香港最後的死囚】
對於90多歲的黃娣來說,1966年11月16日是難以放下的日子。那一天,她一手照顧成人的堂弟被處決,也成了香港最後一個死囚。究竟為何會被判死刑?黃娣怎樣看待這位堂弟?新聞刺針找到她,分享心頭點滴。
【全民皆針】報料方式
WhatsApp/Telegram:91464510
Instagram:newslancet
Facebook Inbox:新聞刺針
國際特赦組織香港分會 Amnesty International Hong Kong
國際特赦組織香港分會死刑關注組 Abolish the Death Penalty Group of Amnesty International HK
#世界反死刑日
abolish death penalty 在 TO G Youtube 的最佳貼文
最近,废死刑议题再次在马来西亚引起民众热烈的讨论
可能很多人并不了解什么是”废死刑“,所以今天这个影片让大家可以了解支持废死刑的人,到底在想些什么。
在做这个影片之前我已经预感会有很多负评,但是我还是想拍出来,因为我想可能很多人从一开始就拒绝对废死刑的任何信息,思考和了解,就好像认识一个人,一开始就看他不顺眼,怎么会想尝试了解他呢?所以作为一个文明人,我不强迫大家和我想的一样,但是我希望大家能理性的尝试聆听。若你还是坚定你的立场,我尊重。但如果没有经过了解,就认定废死刑是不好,死刑是好,我会可怜你,因为你的偏见造成你视野的窄小。或许废死刑也不一定是好,但是希望我们思想碰撞后,我们可以一起找到一个适合这个时代的代替方案和方法。
instagram:
+2
https://www.instagram.com/jiaer123/
TOG fanpage : https://www.facebook.com/gottog333/?r...
资料如下:
廢除死刑是否會使殺人案增加?
https://www.thenewslens.com/article/1...
欧盟不满台湾省恢复执行死刑,高尚还是伪善?
https://user.guancha.cn/main/content?...
废除死刑非向罪犯妥协
http://news.seehua.com/?p=400204
废死刑的一些思考
http://news.seehua.com/?p=399608
死刑,并不安全
https://www.malaysiakini.com/columns/...
你为什么支持死刑,死刑是最好的惩罚手段还是毫无代价的解脱?
https://www.zhihu.com/question/25084350
网路大调查 死刑存废十大理由
https://ivoting.chinatimes.com/cn/201...
为什么我们不能废除死刑
http://bbs.tianya.cn/post-law-159706-...
我为什么要支持死刑
http://godzillahome.pixnet.net/blog/p...
贊成死刑
http://f90274.pixnet.net/blog/post/29...
分析:中国和世界的死刑存废争议
https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/simp/ind...
死刑存廢爭議:台灣殘忍兇殺案的反思
https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/445...
国际特赦组织:中国处决人数为全球之冠
https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/simp/chi...
美国社会的公共政策
https://books.google.com.my/books?id=...
abolish death penalty 在 Abolishing The Mandatory Death Penalty | Joe Middleton 的推薦與評價
... <看更多>