Barak Obama's statement on killing of George Floyd.
As millions of people across the country take to the streets and raise their voices in response to the killing of George Floyd and the ongoing problem of unequal justice, many people have reached out asking how we can sustain momentum to bring about real change.
Ultimately, it’s going to be up to a new generation of activists to shape strategies that best fit the times. But I believe there are some basic lessons to draw from past efforts that are worth remembering.
First, the waves of protests across the country represent a genuine and legitimate frustration over a decades-long failure to reform police practices and the broader criminal justice system in the United States. The overwhelming majority of participants have been peaceful, courageous, responsible, and inspiring. They deserve our respect and support, not condemnation — something that police in cities like Camden and Flint have commendably understood.
On the other hand, the small minority of folks who’ve resorted to violence in various forms, whether out of genuine anger or mere opportunism, are putting innocent people at risk, compounding the destruction of neighborhoods that are often already short on services and investment and detracting from the larger cause. I saw an elderly black woman being interviewed today in tears because the only grocery store in her neighborhood had been trashed. If history is any guide, that store may take years to come back. So let’s not excuse violence, or rationalize it, or participate in it. If we want our criminal justice system, and American society at large, to operate on a higher ethical code, then we have to model that code ourselves.
Second, I’ve heard some suggest that the recurrent problem of racial bias in our criminal justice system proves that only protests and direct action can bring about change, and that voting and participation in electoral politics is a waste of time. I couldn’t disagree more. The point of protest is to raise public awareness, to put a spotlight on injustice, and to make the powers that be uncomfortable; in fact, throughout American history, it’s often only been in response to protests and civil disobedience that the political system has even paid attention to marginalized communities. But eventually, aspirations have to be translated into specific laws and institutional practices — and in a democracy, that only happens when we elect government officials who are responsive to our demands.
Moreover, it’s important for us to understand which levels of government have the biggest impact on our criminal justice system and police practices. When we think about politics, a lot of us focus only on the presidency and the federal government. And yes, we should be fighting to make sure that we have a president, a Congress, a U.S. Justice Department, and a federal judiciary that actually recognize the ongoing, corrosive role that racism plays in our society and want to do something about it. But the elected officials who matter most in reforming police departments and the criminal justice system work at the state and local levels.
It’s mayors and county executives that appoint most police chiefs and negotiate collective bargaining agreements with police unions. It’s district attorneys and state’s attorneys that decide whether or not to investigate and ultimately charge those involved in police misconduct. Those are all elected positions. In some places, police review boards with the power to monitor police conduct are elected as well. Unfortunately, voter turnout in these local races is usually pitifully low, especially among young people — which makes no sense given the direct impact these offices have on social justice issues, not to mention the fact that who wins and who loses those seats is often determined by just a few thousand, or even a few hundred, votes.
So the bottom line is this: if we want to bring about real change, then the choice isn’t between protest and politics. We have to do both. We have to mobilize to raise awareness, and we have to organize and cast our ballots to make sure that we elect candidates who will act on reform.
Finally, the more specific we can make demands for criminal justice and police reform, the harder it will be for elected officials to just offer lip service to the cause and then fall back into business as usual once protests have gone away. The content of that reform agenda will be different for various communities. A big city may need one set of reforms; a rural community may need another. Some agencies will require wholesale rehabilitation; others should make minor improvements. Every law enforcement agency should have clear policies, including an independent body that conducts investigations of alleged misconduct. Tailoring reforms for each community will require local activists and organizations to do their research and educate fellow citizens in their community on what strategies work best.
But as a starting point, here’s a report and toolkit developed by the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and based on the work of the Task Force on 21st Century Policing that I formed when I was in the White House. And if you’re interested in taking concrete action, we’ve also created a dedicated site at the Obama Foundation to aggregate and direct you to useful resources and organizations who’ve been fighting the good fight at the local and national levels for years.
I recognize that these past few months have been hard and dispiriting — that the fear, sorrow, uncertainty, and hardship of a pandemic have been compounded by tragic reminders that prejudice and inequality still shape so much of American life. But watching the heightened activism of young people in recent weeks, of every race and every station, makes me hopeful. If, going forward, we can channel our justifiable anger into peaceful, sustained, and effective action, then this moment can be a real turning point in our nation’s long journey to live up to our highest ideals.
Let’s get to work.
https://medium.com/@BarackObama/how-to-make-this-moment-the-turning-point-for-real-change-9fa209806067
同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過5,140的網紅Ghost Island Media 鬼島之音,也在其Youtube影片中提到,What is it like working for giant corporations? What is it like holding corporate executives responsible for their impact on society? Nature N8 sits d...
impact of activism 在 Sean Lee-Davies Facebook 的精選貼文
Honored to have participated in my third TEDx, this time at HK's Centennial College.
This talk was entitled "Passion and Purpose : Create your Impact" and was about my take on how to use passion to help make a positive impact on the planet, as well as how we’re using tech for sustainability & conservation at @awethenticstudio and @projectcchange
�You can check out the talk here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDTxaWBdoWk
#tedxcentennialcollege
#tedx
#passion
#activism
#impact
#ted
#conservation @ The University of Hong Kong Centennial College
impact of activism 在 多益達人 林立英文 Facebook 的最佳解答
【時事新聞】
Oxford Dictionaries add 'clicktivism' and 'haterade' as new words for angry times
牛津字典看待川普的新字創造
Donald Trump's linguistic dexterity may be questionable, but the US president's lexicon has had an impact on the English language, which is reflected in the latest additions to oxforddictionaries.com, the online reference guide to current English.
川普的語言技巧可能受人質疑,但這位美國總統的常用語已對英語造成了影響,這在最新增補的牛津線上詞典中可見一斑。牛津線上詞典是流行英語的參考指南。
New coinages that reflect the latest wave of online political activism form a significant section of more than 300 new definitions in the database, which is a sister work to the Oxford English Dictionary.
反映最新一波網路政治活動的新字已在這個資料庫中組成了300多個新條目。牛津線上字典是「牛津英語大詞典」的姐妹版。
Additions including "clicktivism" (a pejorative word for armchair activists on social media), "haterade" (excessive negativity, criticism, or resentment), "otherize" (view or treat – a person or group of people – as intrinsically different from and alien to oneself) and "herd mentality" (the tendency for people's behavior or beliefs to conform to those of the group to which they belong) all emerged during the 2016 battle for the White House, said head of content development Angus Stevenson.
牛津線上字典內容開發負責人安格斯•史蒂文生說,新增詞彙包括"clicktivism"(網路點擊行動主義)、"haterade"(極端仇恨)、"otherize"(異己)和"herd mentality"(羊群心態),它們都曾出現在2016年的白宮選戰中。
"We are getting a convergence of high-level politics and online language in quite a new way," Stevenson said. "We had all the words around Brexit in the last update and we are now starting to see all the words around Trump coming into the dictionary."
史蒂文生說:「我們以新的形式將高級政治和網路用語結合。在上一次更新字典資料庫時,我們吸收了所有與英國脫歐有關的字詞。現在,我們正在將與川普有關的字詞收錄到線上字典中。」
Stevenson said that new terms from Trump, his supporters and opponents were emerging more rapidly than in the past. "We have lots to add all the time. We don't have 'fake news' or 'alternative fact' this time, because they have just started gaining currency, but I am sure they will be in the next update," he added.
史蒂文生說,來自川普及其支持者與反對者的這些新字的出現速度比以往任何時候都快。他還補充說:「我們總是有很多詞語要添加。這一次,我們沒有收錄'fake news'(假消息)及'alternative fact'(另類事實),因為它們剛開始流傳,但我可以確定的是下次更新自典時,它們將被收錄。」
As well as political terms, public conversations about diet, fitness and gender were a strong influence on the words included in the latest update. "Superfruit", a nutrient-rich fruit considered to be especially beneficial for health and wellbeing; HIIT, the acronym for high-intensity interval training; and "third gender", a category of people who do not identify simply as male or female, all made it into the online database.
與政治詞彙一樣,人們關於飲食、健康和性別的交談也對這次的詞彙更新造成了很大的影響。"Superfruit"(超級水果),指的是一種富含營養的水果,對身體健康非常有益;"HIIT",是"high-intensity interval training"(高強度間隔訓練)的首字母縮寫;"third gender"(第三性別),指的是那種無法被簡單判定為男性或女性的群體。這些字詞都被收錄進線上資料庫中。
Social media were the source for many of the new coinages, though most were the kind of compounds that would have language purists clutching their pearls. "Craptacular" (remarkably poor and disappointing), "bronde" (hair dyed both blond and brunette) and "fitspiration" (a person or thing that serves as motivation for someone to sustain or improve health and fitness) all made the cut.
社交媒體是許多新鮮詞彙的來源,儘管其中的大多數詞語都是複合字,這些複合字會讓語言純粹主義者大驚失色。"Craptacular"(意思是特別的窮困和沮喪)、"bronde"(指的是被染成金色和淺黑色的頭髮)以及"fitspiration"(指的是一個人或一種物品,用來作為維持或提升某人健康的動力)都達標了。
Stevenson said the need for brevity on Twitter was not responsible for rising numbers of compound words, but it had widened the pool of those inventing new terms. "People feel much freer to coin their own words these days," he said, advising anyone who wished to make a permanent dent in the English language to make sure that their word sounded attractive. Citing the word "vlog", he said ugly-sounding words tended not to gain very wide currency. He added: "They have to have a euphonious sound."
史蒂文生說,推特對詞彙簡潔性的要求並不是複合字數量增加的原因,但這的確為創造新詞彙的人們拓寬了道路。「如今,人們可以更自由地創造字詞,」他說,他建議那些想要在英語詞彙上留下永久印記的人們務必要確保他們所創造的新字發音好聽。他引用"vlog"這個字,然後說發音很難聽的字一般都不會被大家廣泛使用。他補充說:「這些字詞得有一個悅耳的讀音。」
#高雄人 #學習英文 請找 #多益達人林立英文
#高中英文一個月4800元
#成人英文一個月4800元
#時事英文
impact of activism 在 Ghost Island Media 鬼島之音 Youtube 的最佳解答
What is it like working for giant corporations? What is it like holding corporate executives responsible for their impact on society? Nature N8 sits down with Christine Bader, former head of CSR for Amazon, and before that, a long-term employee at BP.
We discuss how Christine’s experiences in Indonesia, China, and the U.K. led her to revelations about sustainability and work culture, and where we can begin to think about the life we really want. Now, Christine is the co-founder of The Life I Want, a story-telling project reimagining a future of work that works for all.
Here are references discussed in the episode:
+ New project by Christine: “The Life I want” (2018): https://www.thelifeiwant.co/
+ Reuters article by Christine: Commentary: Red Hen, Microsoft and the power of workplace activism (2018): https://www.reuters.com/article/us-bader-activism-commentary/commentary-red-hen-microsoft-and-the-power-of-workplace-activism-idUSKBN1JO29K
+ NYT article by Christine: The Year I Learned to Quit (2018): https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/27/well/the-year-i-learned-to-quit.html
+ Book by Christine: “Evolution of a Corporate Idealist: When Girl Meets Oil” (2014): https://www.amazon.com/Evolution-Corporate-Idealist-When-Meets/dp/1937134881/
+ NYT article by John Elkington Opinion | Going Green (2012): https://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/22/opinion/global-agenda-magazine-going-green.html
+ A book by Wayne Muller: A Life of Being, Having, and Doing Enough (2011): https://www.amazon.com/Life-Being-Having-Doing-Enough/dp/0307591395
WASTE NOT WHY NOT
Support us on Patreon:
http://patreon.com/wastenotwhynot
Subscribe to our newsletter:
https://wastenotwhynot.substack.com/
Follow us on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/wastenotpod
Send your questions to:
ask@wastenotwhynot.com
SHOW CREDIT
Emily Y. Wu (Producer / Editing)
https://twitter.com/emilyywu
Nate Maynard (Producer)
https://twitter.com/N8MAY
Yu-Chen Lai (Production Assistant / Editing)
https://twitter.com/aGuavaEmoji
Thomas Lee (Brand Design)
Ghost Island Media (Production Company)
https://twitter.com/ghostislandme
www.ghostisland.media
MB01WR8IJHWPCOG
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9daf8/9daf8caed092953f400f45c45de9b27dd73cf360" alt="post-title"